Literature DB >> 2219564

Immune status and immune therapy of renal cell carcinoma.

K H Bichler1, S Kleinknecht, W L Strohmaier.   

Abstract

At present, no sufficient therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma is available. Several immunotherapeutical protocols have been studied, success rates, however, were inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to assess the pretherapeutic immunological status of 13 patients with metastatic and 16 patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma and of 15 healthy volunteers. Determined were differential blood counts, lymphocyte subpopulations, beta 2-microglobulin, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), neopterin, immunoglobulin, fibronectin and ferritin. Additionally, these parameters were recorded for monitoring an immunotherapeutical approach with the xenogeneic biological response modifier Keyhole limpet hemocyanine (KLH) in 10 patients with metastatic and in 5 patients with nonmetastatic disease. The pretherapeutic immunological status of patients with metastatic disease was characterized by significantly reduced T4-, T8- and B-cell counts. Significantly increased were granulocyte counts, beta 2-microglobulin, neopterin and TNF. In patients who did not suffer from metastases, only beta 2-microglobulin and neopterin were increased significantly. During immunotherapy, in patients with metastases, there was a decline of lymphocyte subsets and of the T4/T8-ratio, which correlated with progress of the disease. Humoral immune parameters showed no changes compared to pretherapeutic values. In patients who did not suffer from metastases, cellular immune parameters showed stable values during immunotherapy; neopterin, beta 2-microglobulin and TNF increased considerably. These findings indicate immunosuppression in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, increasing with progression of the disease and possibly impairing the immunostimulating effects of biological response modifiers during immunotherapy. In conclusion, the clinical response of metastatic renal cell carcinoma to immunotherapy might be improved if the immunostimulant is combined with agents suitable to overcome immunosuppression, i.e. low doses of cyclophosphamide or inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis. In addition, assessment of immune parameters for monitoring the actual immune status of a patient and the immunological effects of therapy was found to be a necessary part of immunotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2219564     DOI: 10.1159/000281720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  4 in total

1.  Circulating immune markers in advanced renal cell carcinoma during immunotherapy with interferon gamma.

Authors:  K Höbarth; A Hallas; G Steiner; A Gomahr; W Aulitzky; M Marberger
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1996

2.  Rapana thomasiana grosse (gastropoda) haemocyanin: spectroscopic studies of the structure in solution and the conformational stability of the native protein and its structural subunits.

Authors:  P Dolashka; N Genov; K Parvanova; W Voelter; M Geiger; S Stoeva
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Tumor necrosis factor in benign and malign tissue of the kidney.

Authors:  K H Bichler; S Kleinknecht; H J Nelde; W L Strohmaier
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1991

4.  Interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1beta in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  N Yoshida; S Ikemoto; K Narita; K Sugimura; S Wada; R Yasumoto; T Kishimoto; T Nakatani
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-05-06       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.