Literature DB >> 22193295

Discrete foci containing RNase A are found in nucleoli of HeLa cells after aging in culture.

M Costanzo1, B Cisterna, O O Zharskaya, O V Zatsepina, M Biggiogera.   

Abstract

We have studied by means of ultrastructural immunocytochemistry the localization of RNase A in nuclei of HeLa cells in control conditions and following cell ageing in culture. We have found that roundish, electron dense foci, which contain a significant amount of RNase A, can be detected within nucleoli of aged cells. These bodies also contain RNA and lack ribosomal S3 proteins, and may represent either simple storage sites or areas where RNA degradation takes place.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22193295      PMCID: PMC3284151          DOI: 10.4081/ejh.2011.e15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Histochem        ISSN: 1121-760X            Impact factor:   3.188


Introduction

The cell nucleus contains several different structures or functional domains, among which the nucleolus, the interchromatin granule clusters (IGC), Cajal bodies and other nuclear bodies, whose functions range from the storage of specific factors to the shuttling of proteins among the various domains. They can be found in several locations in the cell nucleus; in many cases, the functions of these bodies are still to be completely elucidated.[1] For some of these structures, such as promyelocytic leukaemia (PML) bodies or Cajal bodies, marker proteins have been described.[2,3] In this view, we are studying the presence of several proteins as possible markers of nuclear structures (manuscript in preparation); in particular, we are interested in possible storage structures for nucleases. In fact, as for RNAs, data in the literature suggest that more than 90% of the newly synthesized RNA is degraded in the nucleus[4] and this destruction is carried out by means of several mechanisms apt to recognize damaged or nonsense RNA. The reason of such nonproductive RNA synthesis is not clear: one hypothesis claims that this high hnRNA transcription rate would maintain chromatin domains open to prevent the formation of inactive chromatin states.[4] There is no hint, so far, as to where RNA degradation could take place in the nucleus. It is known that the perichromatin area is the site where transcription, co-transcriptional splicing and cleavage mechanism are located;[5] in this view, it is possible that RNA degradation could be cotranscriptional or immediately subsequent to RNA synthesis. It is also well known that in mammals the most actively synthesised type of RNA is ribosomal RNA (rRNA).[6] Therefore, we focused our attention on the possible localization of nucleases inside the nucleolus; to this purpose, we have studied by means of ultrastructural immunocytochemistry the nucleolar localization of RNase A in control and aging HeLa cells. Since nuclear degradation of RNA can be accomplished - at least in part - by RNase A, we have used an anti-RNase A antibody to detect this enzyme in the cell nucleus, with the aim of finding whether any storage or shuttling system do exist.

Materials and Methods

Cells and treatments

HeLa cells were grown in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine and 100 units each of streptomycin and penicillin, in 25 cm[2] plastic flasks or on 4 cm2 glass coverslips in multi-well dishes on a air atmosphere containing 5% of CO2 (all reagents and plastic were from Euroclone, Milan, Italy). The HeLa-Ibch cells represent a subline isolated at the Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, and are aged cells obtained after six month of culture under the same conditions. These cells were free from any detectable contaminations and were characterized by an increased number of apoptotic cells, which were not considered in the present investigation.

Electron microscopy and ultra-structural immunocytochemistry

The cells were harvested by trypsinization (0.25% trypsin in PBS containing 0.5% EDTA) and immediately fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (2 h at 4°C) in the culture medium. The cell pellets were embedded in 2% agar in water, thoroughly rinsed with Sörensen buffer (pH 7.2) and dehydrated in ethanol. Finally the cells were embedded in LR White resin and polymerized at 60°C for 24 h. Thin sections were collected on nickel grids covered with a Formvar-carbon film and incubated on normal goat serum (NGS) for 3 min. For immunolabeling, the grids were floated for 17h at 4°C onto a solution of 0.1% bovine serum albumine and 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS containing the primary anti-RNase A antibody[7] diluted 1:200. After rinsing with PBS-Tween and PBS, grids were incubated with NGS as above and then reacted with a goat-anti rabbit secondary antibody conjugated with 12 nm or 6 nm colloidal gold (The Jackson Lab., Bar Harbor, ME, USA) for 30 min at room temperature (RT), rinsed and finally stained. To reduce chromatin contrast and selectively reveal nuclear ribonucleoprotein constituents, the sections were bleached by the EDTA method[8] or selectively stained for RNA with terbium citrate.[9] The samples were observed on a Zeiss 900 EM operating at 80kV. The gold grains in some of the micrographs have been digitally contrasted with Photoshop software.

Immunofluorescence

HeLa cells were grown on coverslips, fixed for 7 min with 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS, rinsed in PBS and left 30 min in 70% ethanol at −20°C. The coverslips were rehydrated in PBS and then incubated with the anti-RNase A antibody, diluted 1:150 in PBS for 1h at RT, rinsed in PBS and incubated with an Alexa 488-conjugated goat-anti rabbit antibody, diluted 1:200 for 1 h at RT, rinsed, counterstained with Hoechst 33342 for 5 min, and finally mounted with Mowiol. The cells were observed with an Olympus BX51 microscope equipped with a 100 W mercury lamp under the following conditions: 330- to 385-nm excitation filter (excf), 400-nm dichroic mirror (dm), and 420-nm barrier filter (bf), for Hoechst 33258; 450- to 480- nm excf, 500-nm dm, and 515 nm bf for Alexa 488. Images were recorded with an Olympus Camedia C-5050 digital camera and stored on a PC by the Olympus software for processing and printing.

Results

The anti-RNase A antibody used in this study recognizes the enzyme in several mammalian species, including humans.[7] Normally, a great part of the labelling is present in the cytoplasm (not shown) as well as in specific subnuclear locations such as the perichromatin area (manuscript in preparation). Intriguingly, in aging HeLa cells the antibody often detects the enzyme also in discrete parts of the nucleolus, and the labelling always covers roughly roundish areas about 0.2–0.4 µm in diameter (Figure 1a) which are more electrondense than the nucleolar body. This area is finely fibrillar and homogeneous and is morphologically different from any of the typical nucleolar components, the dense fibrillar component, the fibrilar centre or the granular component. After terbium staining to specifically reveal RNA, an area similar to that labelled in Figure 1a can be seen as containing RNA fibrils (Figure 1b and inset). The terbium staining confirmed that this RNA-containing structure does not seem to co-locate with any of the nucleolar components. Apparently, there is no preferential relationship with a given nucleolar component. After immunofluorescence for RNase A detection and DNA counterstaining, the nuclear labelling was mainly found in the nucleolus, where RNase A distribution proved to be inhomogeneous with some more densely labelled areas (arrow in Figure 1c). This seems consistent with the RNase A focal localization observed at electron microscopy. The foci described above are clearly revealed by anti-RNase A immunolabelling and terbium staining (Figure 1d,f). In some cases, labelling for the nucleolar protein S3, present in the small ribosomal subunit, can be seen in the nucleolar body at the periphery of one of the terbium-positive nucleolar foci (Figure 1e). These features were never found in not aging control HeLa cells (not shown).
Figure 1

a) Aged HeLa cell after EDTA staining. The labelling for RNAase A is present exclusively over a dense area near the periphery of the nucleolus. Bar: 0.25 µm. b) Aged HeLa cell after terbium staining specific for RNA. The peripheral roundish area (arrow) contains RNA fibers. In the inset, the fibrils are clearly visible. Bar: 0.25 µm. c) After immunofluorescence labeling for RNase A, the nucleolus is clearly not homogeneously labelled. The arrow points to a bright spot. Bar: 10 µm. d) Terbium staining and labelling for RNAse demonstrate the colocalization of these components in the dense structure. Bar: 0.25 µm. e) The dense body is labelled only at the periphery by the anti-S3 antibody. The ribosomal protein is present in the DFC e GC. Bar: 0.25 µm. f) Terbium staining and labelling for RNAse A. A dense body (arrow) in the close vicinity of a fibrillar centre (FC). Bar: 0.25 µm.

a) Aged HeLa cell after EDTA staining. The labelling for RNAase A is present exclusively over a dense area near the periphery of the nucleolus. Bar: 0.25 µm. b) Aged HeLa cell after terbium staining specific for RNA. The peripheral roundish area (arrow) contains RNA fibers. In the inset, the fibrils are clearly visible. Bar: 0.25 µm. c) After immunofluorescence labeling for RNase A, the nucleolus is clearly not homogeneously labelled. The arrow points to a bright spot. Bar: 10 µm. d) Terbium staining and labelling for RNAse demonstrate the colocalization of these components in the dense structure. Bar: 0.25 µm. e) The dense body is labelled only at the periphery by the anti-S3 antibody. The ribosomal protein is present in the DFC e GC. Bar: 0.25 µm. f) Terbium staining and labelling for RNAse A. A dense body (arrow) in the close vicinity of a fibrillar centre (FC). Bar: 0.25 µm.

Discussion

The nucleolus is the site of pre-ribosome biogenesis and is also involved in other, noncanonical, functions.[6,10] The main activity, however, is the synthesis of rRNAs and its association with ribosomal proteins to form the ribosomal subunits. Transcriptional activity is very active in HeLa cells, and it is known to decrease with aging in culture. Interestingly, in the nucleolar body of aging HeLa cells we have found discrete, focal regions, which are enriched in RNase A. Since the antibody used recognizes both the active and the inactive form of the enzyme, it is impossible to know whether the foci represent simple storage sites or areas where RNA degradation takes place. However, since these bodies always contain detectable amounts of RNA, as seen with terbium staining, RNase A is very probably inactive. The presence of these structures is not constant, and their morphology is clearly recognizable from the other nucleolar components. To our knowledge there is no mention of similar structures in the literature. When other nuclear bodies like Cajal bodies were found embedded into the nucleolus, their morphology was still recognizable.[11,12] Moreover, these foci are different also from the nucleolus-associated domains described by Malatesta et al.[13] in tissues from hibernating mammals. An interesting hypothesis would be that RNA degradation takes place near the site of transcription and especially increases whenever the rate of error is particularly high (as it likely occurs in ageing)[14,15] or there is a need for rapidly blocking the transcript from reaching the cytoplasm: under these circumstances, a particular structure accumulating RNase appears inside the nucleolus. It will be interesting to investigate whether this RNase-containing bodies or foci do also occur in other cell models in vitro after treatments inducing massive impairment of transcription or translation, or in vivo in aging animals.
  15 in total

Review 1.  The balance sheet for transcription: an analysis of nuclear RNA metabolism in mammalian cells.

Authors:  D A Jackson; A Pombo; F Iborra
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Perichromatin fibrils are in situ forms of nascent transcripts.

Authors:  S Fakan
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 3.  Biogenesis of nuclear bodies.

Authors:  Miroslav Dundr; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 4.  Ribosome biogenesis: from structure to dynamics.

Authors:  Barbara Cisterna; Marco Biggiogera
Journal:  Int Rev Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.813

5.  Perichromatin fibrils accumulation in hepatocyte nuclei reveals alterations of pre-mRNA processing during aging.

Authors:  Manuela Malatesta; Marco Biggiogera; Barbara Cisterna; Marta Balietti; Carlo Bertoni-Freddari; Patrizia Fattoretti
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.311

6.  Fine structural specific visualization of RNA on ultrathin sections.

Authors:  M Biggiogera; S Fakan
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Is the coiled body involved in nucleolar functions?

Authors:  M Malatesta; C Zancanaro; T E Martin; E K Chan; F Amalric; R Lührmann; P Vogel; S Fakan
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 8.  Nuclear bodies: random aggregates of sticky proteins or crucibles of macromolecular assembly?

Authors:  A Gregory Matera; Mario Izaguire-Sierra; Kavita Praveen; T K Rajendra
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  Nuclei of aged myofibres undergo structural and functional changes suggesting impairment in RNA processing.

Authors:  M Malatesta; F Perdoni; S Muller; C Zancanaro; C Pellicciari
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.188

Review 10.  A manually curated network of the PML nuclear body interactome reveals an important role for PML-NBs in SUMOylation dynamics.

Authors:  Ellen Van Damme; Kris Laukens; Thanh Hai Dang; Xaveer Van Ostade
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.580

View more
  7 in total

1.  Immunofluorescent localization of ubiquitin and proteasomes in nucleolar vacuoles of soybean root meristematic cells.

Authors:  D Stępiński
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.188

Review 2.  Skeletal muscle features in myotonic dystrophy and sarcopenia: do similar nuclear mechanisms lead to skeletal muscle wasting?

Authors:  M Malatesta
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.188

Review 3.  Histochemistry for nucleic acid research: 60 years in the European Journal of Histochemistry.

Authors:  Claudio Casali; Stella Siciliani; Lorena Zannino; Marco Biggiogera
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 1.966

4.  Histochemistry as an irreplaceable approach for investigating functional cytology and histology.

Authors:  C Pellicciari
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.188

Review 5.  Functional ultrastructure of the plant nucleolus.

Authors:  Dariusz Stępiński
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.356

6.  Ultrastructural immunocytochemistry shows impairment of RNA pathways in skeletal muscle nuclei of old mice: A link to sarcopenia?

Authors:  Maria Assunta Lacavalla; Barbara Cisterna; Carlo Zancanaro; Manuela Malatesta
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.188

7.  On the future contents of a small journal of histochemistry.

Authors:  C Pellicciari
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.188

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.