BACKGROUND: Transplantation is the treatment of choice for organ failure, but a worldwide shortage of suitable organs exists. We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies that explored community attitudes towards living and deceased solid organ donation to inform strategies to improve organ donation rates. METHODS: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and EconLIT were searched. Qualitative studies that explored community attitudes towards living and deceased solid organ donation were included. A thematic synthesis of the results and conclusions reported by primary authors was performed. RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 1019 participants were identified. Eight themes emerged. The decision to be an organ donor was influenced by (i) relational ties; (ii) religious beliefs; (iii) cultural influences; (iv) family influences; (v) body integrity; (vi) previous interactions with the health care system-medical mistrust, validity of brain death and fear of early organ retrieval; (vii) the individual's knowledge about the organ donation process and (viii) major reservations about the process of donation, even in those who support organ donation. CONCLUSIONS: This review of qualitative studies highlights that seemingly intractable factors, such as religion and culture, are often tied in with more complex issues such as a distrust of the medical system, misunderstandings about religious stances and ignorance about the donation process. Intervention that could be considered includes culturally appropriate strategies to engage minority groups, especially through religious or cultural leaders, and more comprehensively available information about the donation process and its positive outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Transplantation is the treatment of choice for organ failure, but a worldwide shortage of suitable organs exists. We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies that explored community attitudes towards living and deceased solid organ donation to inform strategies to improve organ donation rates. METHODS: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and EconLIT were searched. Qualitative studies that explored community attitudes towards living and deceased solid organ donation were included. A thematic synthesis of the results and conclusions reported by primary authors was performed. RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 1019 participants were identified. Eight themes emerged. The decision to be an organ donor was influenced by (i) relational ties; (ii) religious beliefs; (iii) cultural influences; (iv) family influences; (v) body integrity; (vi) previous interactions with the health care system-medical mistrust, validity of brain death and fear of early organ retrieval; (vii) the individual's knowledge about the organ donation process and (viii) major reservations about the process of donation, even in those who support organ donation. CONCLUSIONS: This review of qualitative studies highlights that seemingly intractable factors, such as religion and culture, are often tied in with more complex issues such as a distrust of the medical system, misunderstandings about religious stances and ignorance about the donation process. Intervention that could be considered includes culturally appropriate strategies to engage minority groups, especially through religious or cultural leaders, and more comprehensively available information about the donation process and its positive outcomes.
Authors: J Daryl Thornton; Catherine Sullivan; Jeffrey M Albert; Maria Cedeño; Bridget Patrick; Julie Pencak; Kristine A Wong; Margaret D Allen; Linda Kimble; Heather Mekesa; Gordon Bowen; Ashwini R Sehgal Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Anh Q Nguyen; Saad K Anjum; Samantha E Halpern; Komal Kumar; Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Brianna Doby; Ashton A Shaffer; Allan B Massie; Aaron A R Tobian; Dorry L Segev; Jeremy Sugarman; Christine M Durand Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Ariella Maghen; Grecia B Vargas; Sarah E Connor; Sima Nassiri; Elisabeth M Hicks; Lorna Kwan; Amy D Waterman; Sally L Maliski; Jeffrey L Veale Journal: J Clin Nurs Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 3.036
Authors: Galen E Switzer; Jessica G Bruce; Larissa Myaskovsky; Andrea DiMartini; Diana Shellmer; Dennis L Confer; Linda K Abress; Roberta J King; Allyson G Harnaha; Sibylle Ohngemach; Mary Amanda Dew Journal: Blood Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Ikechi G Okpechi; Jo-Ann Donner; David C H Harris; Harith M Aljubori; Aminu K Bello; Ezequiel Bellorin-Font; Fergus J Caskey; Allan Collins; Alfonso M Cueto-Manzano; John Feehally; Bak Leong Goh; Kitty J Jager; Masaomi Nangaku; Muhibur Rahman; Manisha Sahay; Abdulkarim Saleh; Laura Sola; Rumeyza Turan Kazancioglu; Rachael C Walker; Robert Walker; Qiang Yao; Xueqing Yu; Ming-Hui Zhao; David W Johnson Journal: Kidney Int Suppl (2011) Date: 2020-02-19
Authors: Alvin Ho-Ting Li; Eric McArthur; Janet Maclean; Cynthia Isenor; Versha Prakash; S Joseph Kim; Greg Knoll; Baiju Shah; Amit X Garg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240