Literature DB >> 22192872

A multi-segment foot model based on anatomically registered technical coordinate systems: method repeatability in pediatric feet.

Prabhav Saraswat1, Bruce A MacWilliams, Roy B Davis.   

Abstract

Several multi-segment foot models to measure the motion of intrinsic joints of the foot have been reported. Use of these models in clinical decision making is limited due to lack of rigorous validation including inter-clinician, and inter-lab variability measures. A model with thoroughly quantified variability may significantly improve the confidence in the results of such foot models. This study proposes a new clinical foot model with the underlying strategy of using separate anatomic and technical marker configurations and coordinate systems. Anatomical landmark and coordinate system identification is determined during a static subject calibration. Technical markers are located at optimal sites for dynamic motion tracking. The model is comprised of the tibia and three foot segments (hindfoot, forefoot and hallux) and inter-segmental joint angles are computed in three planes. Data collection was carried out on pediatric subjects at two sites (Site 1: n=10 subjects by two clinicians and Site 2: five subjects by one clinician). A plaster mold method was used to quantify static intra-clinician and inter-clinician marker placement variability by allowing direct comparisons of marker data between sessions for each subject. Intra-clinician and inter-clinician joint angle variability were less than 4°. For dynamic walking kinematics, intra-clinician, inter-clinician and inter-laboratory variability were less than 6° for the ankle and forefoot, but slightly higher for the hallux. Inter-trial variability accounted for 2-4° of the total dynamic variability. Results indicate the proposed foot model reduces the effects of marker placement variability on computed foot kinematics during walking compared to similar measures in previous models.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22192872     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  10 in total

1.  The Amsterdam Foot Model: a clinically informed multi-segment foot model developed to minimize measurement errors in foot kinematics.

Authors:  Marjolein M van der Krogt; Jaap Harlaar; Wouter Schallig; Josien C van den Noort; Marjolein Piening; Geert J Streekstra; Mario Maas
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Radiographic-directed local coordinate systems critical in kinematic analysis of walking in diabetes-related medial column foot deformity.

Authors:  Mary K Hastings; James Woodburn; Michael J Mueller; Michael J Strube; Jeffrey E Johnson; Krista S Beckert; Michelle L Stein; David R Sinacore
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  The modified Shriners Hospitals for Children Greenville (mSHCG) multi-segment foot model provides clinically acceptable measurements of ankle and midfoot angles: A dual fluoroscopy study.

Authors:  Koren E Roach; K Bo Foreman; Bruce A MacWilliams; Konstantinos Karpos; Jennifer Nichols; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Repeatability of a multi-segment foot model with a 15-marker set in healthy adults.

Authors:  Sang Gyo Seo; Dong Yeon Lee; Hyuk Ju Moon; Sung Ju Kim; Jihyeung Kim; Kyoung Min Lee; Chin Youb Chung; In Ho Choi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Modifying the Rizzoli foot model to improve the diagnosis of pes-planus: application to kinematics of feet in teenagers.

Authors:  Nicola Portinaro; Alberto Leardini; Artemisia Panou; Valerio Monzani; Paolo Caravaggi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  The Glasgow-Maastricht foot model, evaluation of a 26 segment kinematic model of the foot.

Authors:  Michiel Oosterwaal; Sylvain Carbes; Scott Telfer; James Woodburn; Søren Tørholm; Amir A Al-Munajjed; Lodewijk van Rhijn; Kenneth Meijer
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Two-Segment Foot Model for the Biomechanical Analysis of Squat.

Authors:  E Panero; L Gastaldi; W Rapp
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 2.682

8.  Comparison of the kinematics, repeatability, and reproducibility of five different multi-segment foot models.

Authors:  Hyo Jeong Yoo; Hye Sun Park; Dong-Oh Lee; Seong Hyun Kim; Gil Young Park; Tae-Joon Cho; Dong Yeon Lee
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Movement of the human foot in 100 pain free individuals aged 18-45: implications for understanding normal foot function.

Authors:  Christopher J Nester; Hannah L Jarvis; Richard K Jones; Peter D Bowden; Anmin Liu
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Repeatability of a Multi-segment Foot Model with a 15-Marker Set in Normal Children.

Authors:  Eo Jin Kim; Hyuk Soo Shin; Jae Hee Lee; Min Gyu Kyung; Hyo Jeong Yoo; Won Joon Yoo; Dong Yeon Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-11-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.