Literature DB >> 22192766

Subscapularis function after transosseous repair in shoulder arthroplasty: transosseous subscapularis repair in shoulder arthroplasty.

Dennis Liem1, Kira Kleeschulte, Nicolas Dedy, Tobias L Schulte, Joern Steinbeck, Bjoern Marquardt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative subscapularis function has been identified as an essential factor influencing the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty. The goal of this study was an evaluation of subjective and objective subscapularis function after transosseous refixation.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients with an average age of 71 years (range, 51-86) and follow-up of 43 months (range, 24-67) were included in this study. The subscapularis was tenotomized from the lesser tuberosity and refixation was performed in a transosseous technique through bone tunnels with nonabsorbable sutures. Subscapularis function was evaluated subjectively by the ability to tuck a shirt and objectively with the lift-off test and strength measurement in internal rotation. Radiological assessment included ultrasound evaluation of the subscapularis and an axillary x-ray.
RESULTS: No complete, but 7 partial subscapularis tears were found on ultrasound (30.4%). Five patients were not able to tuck their shirt postoperatively (22.7%). This was associated with an inferior clinical outcome (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score 53.3 vs 76.4; P = .023). The lift-off test was positive in 4 patients  (17.4%), which was also associated with an inferior clinical result (Constant score 52.3% vs 74.2%; P = .021). Nineteen patients were able to go through an internal rotation strength testing in the lift-off position, and averaged 3.8 kg.
CONCLUSION: Although overall reliable refixation of the subscapularis was achieved by transosseous repair, almost 25% of patients showed signs of decreased function and 30% showed signs of partial defects. Subjective and objective functional deficits had a significant influence on the clinical outcome.
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22192766     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  8 in total

1.  [Survival rate and complications of stemmed shoulder prostheses in primary osteoarthritis].

Authors:  U Irlenbusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Arthroscopic partial shoulder resurfacing.

Authors:  Werner Anderl; Bernhard Kriegleder; Manfred Neumaier; Brenda Laky; Philipp Heuberer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Deltopectoral approach for shoulder arthroplasty: anatomic basis.

Authors:  Francois Gadea; Yves Bouju; Julien Berhouet; Guillaume Bacle; Luc Favard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Subscapularis-Sparing Rotator Interval Approach for Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  David P Adkison; Parke W Hudson; James V Worthen; Andrew S Moon; Martim C Pinto; Amit Momaya; Brent A Ponce; Eugene W Brabston
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-11-26

Review 5.  The role of subscapularis repair following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M De Fine; M Sartori; G Giavaresi; R De Filippis; G Agrò; S Cialdella; Milena Fini; G Pignatti
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  Innervation of the subscapularis: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Brian Sager; Stephen Gates; Garen Collett; Avneesh Chhabra; Michael Khazzam
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-04-26

7.  Single-row vs. double-row refixation of the subscapularis tendon after primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yacine Ameziane; Kristian Nikolaus Schneider; Georg Gosheger; Annika Mischke; Dominik Schorn; Carolin Rickert; Dennis Liem
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Subscapularis integrity, function and EMG/nerve conduction study findings following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Khazzam; Bryan Reyes; Amy Phelan; Stephen Gates
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-05-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.