PURPOSE: To review the initial experience of three institutions using multilumen catheters to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and evaluate dosimetric improvements. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were eligible for this analysis if they met criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation at their respective institution and were not enrolled on the national Phase III trial. Minimum guidelines for treatment planning from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-39/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0413 protocol were followed. Toxicities were coded using common toxicity criteria version 3.0 criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were analyzed as part of this study. Median skin spacing was 11mm with a median skin dose of 86.9% (% of prescription dose [PD]). Median rib dose was 76.1% of the PD (range, 4.3-155.7%). The V(90), V(95), and V(100) of the PD for the planning target volume evaluation was 95.4%, 95.2%, and 80.3%, respectively. Seven patients had both skin and rib spacing <7mm, with the median skin dose and rib dose being 113.4% and 130.9% of the PD. For these cases, the median V(90), V(95), and V(100) of the PD was 99.2%, 94.3%, and 81.1%, respectively, whereas the median V(150) and V(200) were 22.5cc and 7.4cc. Overall, Grade I and II radiation dermatitis were noted in 41.9% and 6.5% of patients. CONCLUSION: The multilumen device led to improvements in target coverage and normal structure doses compared with traditionally accepted guidelines. Similar toxicities were seen compared with single-lumen devices, even in patients with skin and rib spacing <7mm.
PURPOSE: To review the initial experience of three institutions using multilumen catheters to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and evaluate dosimetric improvements. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were eligible for this analysis if they met criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation at their respective institution and were not enrolled on the national Phase III trial. Minimum guidelines for treatment planning from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-39/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0413 protocol were followed. Toxicities were coded using common toxicity criteria version 3.0 criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were analyzed as part of this study. Median skin spacing was 11mm with a median skin dose of 86.9% (% of prescription dose [PD]). Median rib dose was 76.1% of the PD (range, 4.3-155.7%). The V(90), V(95), and V(100) of the PD for the planning target volume evaluation was 95.4%, 95.2%, and 80.3%, respectively. Seven patients had both skin and rib spacing <7mm, with the median skin dose and rib dose being 113.4% and 130.9% of the PD. For these cases, the median V(90), V(95), and V(100) of the PD was 99.2%, 94.3%, and 81.1%, respectively, whereas the median V(150) and V(200) were 22.5cc and 7.4cc. Overall, Grade I and II radiation dermatitis were noted in 41.9% and 6.5% of patients. CONCLUSION: The multilumen device led to improvements in target coverage and normal structure doses compared with traditionally accepted guidelines. Similar toxicities were seen compared with single-lumen devices, even in patients with skin and rib spacing <7mm.