Literature DB >> 22192439

Fractions but not negative numbers are represented on the mental number line.

Dana Ganor-Stern1.   

Abstract

The present study is the first to directly compare numerical representations of positive numbers, negative numbers and unit fractions. The results show that negative numbers and unit fractions were not represented in the same way. Distance effects were found when positive numbers were compared with fractions but not when they were compared with negative numbers, thus suggesting that unit fractions but not negative numbers were represented on the number line with positive numbers. As indicated by the semantic congruity effect, negative numbers were perceived to be small, positive numbers were perceived as large, while unit fractions were perceived neither as large nor small. Comparisons between negative numbers were faster than between unit fractions, possibly due to the smaller differences between the holistic magnitudes of the unit fractions. Finally, comparing unit fractions to 1 was faster than comparing them to 0, consistent with the idea that unit fractions are perceived as entities smaller than 1 (Kallai & Tzelgov, 2009). The results are consistent with the idea of a mental division between numbers that represent a quantity (positive numbers and unit fractions) and those that do not (negative numbers).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22192439     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  4 in total

1.  Eye movements reflect and shape strategies in fraction comparison.

Authors:  Anja Ischebeck; Marina Weilharter; Christof Körner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Commentary: The mental representation of integers: An abstract-to-concrete shift in the understanding of mathematical concepts.

Authors:  Melinda A Mende; Samuel Shaki; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-27

3.  An ERP study of the processing of common and decimal fractions: how different they are.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Qi Wang; Chongde Lin; Cody Ding; Xinlin Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The componential processing of fractions in adults and children: effects of stimuli variability and contextual interference.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Qiaochu Fang; Florence C Gabriel; Dénes Szücs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.