BACKGROUND: Little is known about intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings and acute post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcome and long-term clinical outcome between aorto-ostial lesion and shaft lesion after PCI for saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions. METHODS: Aorto-ostial lesion was defined as those arising within 3mm of the origin of SVG and shaft lesion was defined as those arising in remaining portion of SVG. We evaluated pre- and post-PCI IVUS images of 311 SVG lesions and compared IVUS findings and acute post-PCI outcome and 5-year clinical outcome between aorto-ostial lesion (n=64) and shaft lesion (n=247). RESULTS: The presence of positive remodeling (40% vs. 22%, p=0.026), hypoechoic plaque (47% vs. 36%, p=0.035), plaque rupture (23% vs. 8%, p=0.008), multiple plaque rupture (9% vs. 2%, p=0.038), and an intraluminal mass (54% vs. 25%, p<0.001) were significantly more common in shaft lesion than in aorto-ostial lesion. Post-PCI no-reflow (15% vs. 5%, p=0.033), post-PCI tissue prolapse (TP) (40% vs. 23%, p=0.014), and post-PCI creatine kinase-MB elevation more than 3 times normal (14% vs. 8%, p=0.047) were observed more frequently after PCI for shaft lesion than for aorto-ostial lesion. At 5-year clinical follow-up, the incidences of death (25% vs. 13%, p=0.036) and myocardial infarction (24% vs. 11%, p=0.028), but not the rate of target vessel revascularization (36% vs. 25%, p=0.096), were significantly higher in patients with shaft lesion compared with those with aorto-ostial lesion. CONCLUSIONS: SVG shaft lesion has more unstable plaque morphology and this may contribute to the worse acute PCI outcomes and long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings and acute post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcome and long-term clinical outcome between aorto-ostial lesion and shaft lesion after PCI for saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions. METHODS: Aorto-ostial lesion was defined as those arising within 3mm of the origin of SVG and shaft lesion was defined as those arising in remaining portion of SVG. We evaluated pre- and post-PCI IVUS images of 311 SVG lesions and compared IVUS findings and acute post-PCI outcome and 5-year clinical outcome between aorto-ostial lesion (n=64) and shaft lesion (n=247). RESULTS: The presence of positive remodeling (40% vs. 22%, p=0.026), hypoechoic plaque (47% vs. 36%, p=0.035), plaque rupture (23% vs. 8%, p=0.008), multiple plaque rupture (9% vs. 2%, p=0.038), and an intraluminal mass (54% vs. 25%, p<0.001) were significantly more common in shaft lesion than in aorto-ostial lesion. Post-PCI no-reflow (15% vs. 5%, p=0.033), post-PCI tissue prolapse (TP) (40% vs. 23%, p=0.014), and post-PCI creatine kinase-MB elevation more than 3 times normal (14% vs. 8%, p=0.047) were observed more frequently after PCI for shaft lesion than for aorto-ostial lesion. At 5-year clinical follow-up, the incidences of death (25% vs. 13%, p=0.036) and myocardial infarction (24% vs. 11%, p=0.028), but not the rate of target vessel revascularization (36% vs. 25%, p=0.096), were significantly higher in patients with shaft lesion compared with those with aorto-ostial lesion. CONCLUSIONS: SVG shaft lesion has more unstable plaque morphology and this may contribute to the worse acute PCI outcomes and long-term outcomes.
Authors: Faisal Latif; Lauren Uyeda; Robert Edson; Deepak L Bhatt; Steven Goldman; David R Holmes; Sunil V Rao; Kendrick Shunk; Kul Aggarwal; Barry Uretsky; Islam Bolad; Khaled Ziada; Edward McFalls; Anand Irimpen; Huu Tam Truong; Scott Kinlay; Vasilios Papademetriou; Raghava S Velagaleti; Bavana V Rangan; Kreton Mavromatis; Mei-Chiung Shih; Subhash Banerjee; Emmanouil S Brilakis Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 6.546