Literature DB >> 22192253

Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials.

Flávio F Demarco1, Marcos B Corrêa, Maximiliano S Cenci, Rafael R Moraes, Niek J M Opdam.   

Abstract

Resin composites have become the first choice for direct posterior restorations and are increasingly popular among clinicians and patients. Meanwhile, a number of clinical reports in the literature have discussed the durability of these restorations over long periods. In this review, we have searched the dental literature looking for clinical trials investigating posterior composite restorations over periods of at least 5 years of follow-up published between 1996 and 2011. The search resulted in 34 selected studies. 90% of the clinical studies indicated that annual failure rates between 1% and 3% can be achieved with Class I and II posterior composite restorations depending on several factors such as tooth type and location, operator, and socioeconomic, demographic, and behavioral elements. The material properties showed a minor effect on longevity. The main reasons for failure in the long term are secondary caries, related to the individual caries risk, and fracture, related to the presence of a lining or the strength of the material used as well as patient factors such as bruxism. Repair is a viable alternative to replacement, and it can increase significantly the lifetime of restorations. As observed in the literature reviewed, a long survival rate for posterior composite restorations can be expected provided that patient, operator and materials factors are taken into account when the restorations are performed.
Copyright © 2011 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22192253     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  167 in total

1.  A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Fábio Herrmann Coelho-De-Souza; Junara Cristina Camargo; Tiago Beskow; Matheus Dalmolin Balestrin; Celso Afonso Klein-Júnior; Flávio Fernando Demarco
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Good short-term survival rates for posterior resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Ravi Chauhan
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2015-12

3.  The use of micro-CT with image segmentation to quantify leakage in dental restorations.

Authors:  Carola A Carrera; Caixia Lan; David Escobar-Sanabria; Yuping Li; Joel Rudney; Conrado Aparicio; Alex Fok
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Antibacterial activity and ion release of bonding agent containing amorphous calcium phosphate nanoparticles.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Michael D Weir; Lei Cheng; Nancy J Lin; Sheng Lin-Gibson; Laurence C Chow; Xuedong Zhou; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  A Mechanistic study of Plasma Treatment Effects on Demineralized Dentin Surfaces for Improved Adhesive/Dentin Interface Bonding.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Dong; Meng Chen; Yong Wang; Qingsong Yu
Journal:  Clin Plasma Med       Date:  2014-07-01

6.  Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Luciano Casagrande; Alejandra Tejeda Seminario; Marcos Britto Correa; Stefanie Bressan Werle; Marisa Maltz; Flávio Fernando Demarco; Fernando Borba de Araujo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Degradation in the fatigue strength of dentin by cutting, etching and adhesive bonding.

Authors:  H H Lee; H Majd; S Orrego; B Majd; E Romberg; M M Mutluay; D Arola
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.

Authors:  Bruno Baracco; M Victoria Fuentes; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  In vitro near-infrared imaging of natural secondary caries.

Authors:  Jacob C Simon; Seth Lucas; Robert Lee; Cynthia L Darling; Michal Staninec; Ram Vanderhobli; Roger Pelzner; Daniel Fried
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-02-24

10.  Repair or replacement of restorations: A prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Valeria V Gordan; Joseph L Riley; D Brad Rindal; Vibeke Qvist; Jeffrey L Fellows; Deborah A Dilbone; Solomon G Brotman; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.