Literature DB >> 22192087

Is epitope recognition of shrimp allergens useful to predict clinical reactivity?

R Ayuso1, S Sánchez-Garcia, M Pascal, J Lin, G Grishina, Z Fu, M D Ibáñez, J Sastre, H A Sampson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shrimp is a frequent cause of severe allergic reactions world-wide. Due to issues such as cross-reactivity, diagnosis of shrimp allergy is still inaccurate, requiring the need for double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC). A better understanding of the relationship between laboratory findings and clinical reactivity is needed.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sensitization to certain shrimp allergens or recognition of particular IgE epitopes of those allergens are good biomarkers of clinical reactivity to shrimp.
METHODS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients were selected with clinical histories of shrimp allergy. Skin prick test, specific IgE determinations, DBPCFC and immunoblot assays to shrimp extract were performed. IgE binding to synthetic overlapping peptides representing the sequence of the four allergens from the Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) identified to date (Lit v1, Lit v2, Lit v3 and Lit v4) was analysed.
RESULTS: Of 37 (46%) patients, 17 had a positive challenge to shrimp (11 children and 6 adults). By microarray, patients with positive challenges showed more intense binding to shrimp peptides than those with negative challenges. Statistically significant differences in terms of the frequency and intensity of IgE binding to some epitopes were observed between the two groups. Diagnostic efficiency was higher for individual epitopes than for proteins. Particularly, efficiency was highest for certain Lit v 1 and Lit v 2 epitopes, followed by Lit v 3 and Lit v 4 epitopes. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients with positive shrimp challenges present in general more intense and diverse epitope recognition to all four shrimp allergens. IgE antibodies to these shrimp epitopes could be used as biomarkers for prediction of clinical reactivity in subjects with sensitization to shrimp. Patients with positive shrimp challenges show more intense sensitization and more diverse epitope recognition. Several IgE-binding shrimp epitopes could be used as biomarkers for predicting clinical reactivity in subjects with sensitization to shrimp.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22192087     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03920.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  17 in total

1.  New insights into the allergenicity of tropomyosin: a bioinformatics approach.

Authors:  Juan González-Fernández; Marta Rodero; Alvaro Daschner; Carmen Cuéllar
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 2.  Optimizing the diagnosis of food allergy.

Authors:  Jacob D Kattan; Scott H Sicherer
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Cloning, Expression, and Immunological Characterization of Formosan Subterranean Termite (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae) Arginine Kinase.

Authors:  Christopher P Mattison; Anchalee Tungtrongchitr; Katherine S Tille; Carrie B Cottone; Claudia Riegel
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 1.857

4.  Improved diagnostic clarity in shrimp allergic non-dust-mite sensitized patients.

Authors:  Karen Thursday S Tuano; Sara Anvari; Imelda Celine Hanson; Joud Hajjar; Filiz Seeborg; Lenora M Noroski; Danielle Guffey; Grace Kang; Jordan Scott Orange; Carla M Davis
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.587

5.  Allergen Valency, Dose, and FcεRI Occupancy Set Thresholds for Secretory Responses to Pen a 1 and Motivate Design of Hypoallergens.

Authors:  Avanika Mahajan; Lama A Youssef; Cédric Cleyrat; Rachel Grattan; Shayna R Lucero; Christopher P Mattison; M Frank Erasmus; Bruna Jacobson; Lydia Tapia; William S Hlavacek; Mark Schuyler; Bridget S Wilson
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 6.  Biomarkers in Food Allergy.

Authors:  Antonella Muraro; Stefania Arasi
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 7.  Overview of component resolved diagnostics.

Authors:  Regina Treudler; Jan C Simon
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 8.  Shellfish Allergy: a Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  María Pedrosa; Teresa Boyano-Martínez; Carmen García-Ara; Santiago Quirce
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 9.  Biomarkers in Food Allergy Immunotherapy.

Authors:  LaKeya C Hardy; Johanna M Smeekens; Michael D Kulis
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.806

10.  The usefulness of component-resolved diagnostics in food allergy.

Authors:  Kangmo Ahn
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.764

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.