Literature DB >> 22191852

Scrotal infrared digital thermography in assessment of varicocele--pilot study to assess diagnostic criteria.

T Kulis1, D Kolaric, K Karlovic, M Knezevic, S Antonini, Z Kastelan.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess scrotal thermography in diagnostics of varicocele and suggest potential diagnostic criteria. Twelve patients with clinically diagnosed varicocele were examined with scrotal infrared digital thermography, physical examination and ultrasound/doppler. The main outcome measure was evaluation of thermography diagnostic criteria for varicocele. Mean temperature at left pampiniform plexus was ≥ 34 °C in 83%, and at right pampiniform plexus in all cases was ≤ 34 °C. In 92% of patients, temperature at the left testicle was ≥ 32 °C, whereas at the right testicle it was >32 °C in 50% patients. Temperatures between left and right pampiniform plexus and between left and right testicle were significantly different with P < 0.0001 and P < 0.006 respectively. In all patients, temperature difference between pampiniform plexuses was ≥ 0.6 °C. In 92% of patients, temperature at left pampiniform plexus was equal or higher to thigh temperature with the mean temperature difference of 1.1 ± 1.1 °C. Temperature at right pampiniform plexus was colder than the thigh in 92% of patients. This study suggests diagnostic criteria of five thermographic signs to easily diagnose varicocele. Scrotal thermography presents feasible, short and low cost diagnostic method for varicocele. Further study on a larger number of patients and healthy participants is needed to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of this method.
© 2011 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22191852     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01265.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrologia        ISSN: 0303-4569            Impact factor:   2.775


  3 in total

1.  Time-domain analysis of scrotal thermoregulatory impairment in varicocele.

Authors:  Enas Ismail; Giuseppe Orlando; Paolo Pompa; Daniela Gabrielli; Luigino Di Donato; Daniela Cardone; Arcangelo Merla
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 2.  Diagnosis of clinical and subclinical varicocele: how has it evolved?

Authors:  Ruth E Belay; Gene Omar Huang; Jim Ken-Chie Shen; Edmund Yuey Kun Ko
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of varicocele.

Authors:  Tomasz Lorenc; Leszek Krupniewski; Piotr Palczewski; Marek Gołębiowski
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2016-12-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.