Literature DB >> 22191704

Comparative study between porcine small intestinal submucosa and buccal mucosa in a partial urethra substitution in rabbits.

Paulo Roberto Kawano1, Oscar Eduardo Hidetoshi Fugita, Hamilto Akihissa Yamamoto, Juliany Gomes Quitzan, Carlos Padovani, João Luiz Amaro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several urethral conditions may require tissue substitution. One collagen-base biomaterial that recently emerged as an option is small intestinal submucosa (SIS). The aim of this study was to compare the results of SIS and buccal mucosa for urethral substitution in rabbits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six North Folk male rabbits were randomized into three groups. In all animals, a 10 × 5 mm urethral segment was excised, and the urethral defect was repaired using a one-layer SIS patch (group I [GI]); four-layer SIS (group II [GII]); or buccal mucosa (group III [GIII]). Urethrography was performed preoperatively and after 12 weeks. After sacrifice, graft retraction was objectively measured using Scion Image(®) computer analysis and by calculation of ellipse area. The grade of fibrosis, inflammatory reaction, vascular/epithelial regeneration, and collagen III/I ratio were analyzed by hematoxylin/eosin and Picrosirius red staining.
RESULTS: Urethrography confirmed a wide urethral caliber without any signs of strictures after surgery. Urethral fistulae was diagnosed in 8.3% of cases (1 animal each group). Average graft shrinkage was 55.2% in GI; 44.2% in GII; and 57.2% in GIII (p<0.05). The intensity of chronic inflammation, fibrosis, epithelium regeneration, and neovascularization was similar in all groups (p>0.05). Collagen III/I ratio was higher in GII (GI: 119.6; GII: 257.2 and GIII: 115.0); p<0.01.
CONCLUSIONS: The four-layer SIS is more advantageous than the one-layer SIS and buccal mucosa for urethral substitution in rabbits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22191704     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  1 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of animal and clinical studies on the use of scaffolds for urethral repair.

Authors:  Na Qi; Wen-Jiao Li; Hong Tian
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.