| Literature DB >> 22190739 |
Ryohei Suzuki1, Junko Y Toshima, Jiro Toshima.
Abstract
Clathrin-mediated endocytosis involves a coordinated series of molecular events regulated by interactions among a variety of proteins and lipids through specific domains. One such domain is the Eps15 homology (EH) domain, a highly conserved protein-protein interaction domain present in a number of proteins distributed from yeast to mammals. Several lines of evidence suggest that the yeast EH domain-containing proteins Pan1p, End3p, and Ede1p play important roles during endocytosis. Although genetic and cell-biological studies of these proteins suggested a role for the EH domains in clathrin-mediated endocytosis, it was unclear how they regulate clathrin coat assembly. To explore the role of the EH domain in yeast endocytosis, we mutated those of Pan1p, End3p, or Ede1p, respectively, and examined the effects of single, double, or triple mutation on clathrin coat assembly. We found that mutations of the EH domain caused a defect of cargo internalization and a delay of clathrin coat assembly but had no effect on assembly of the actin patch. We also demonstrated functional redundancy among the EH domains of Pan1p, End3p, and Ede1p for endocytosis. Of interest, the dynamics of several endocytic proteins were differentially affected by various EH domain mutations, suggesting functional diversity of each EH domain.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22190739 PMCID: PMC3279396 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E11-04-0380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Cell ISSN: 1059-1524 Impact factor: 4.138
FIGURE 1:Generation and characterization of EH mutants in Pan1p, Ede1p, and End3p. (A) Sequence alignments of the EH domains in Pan1p, End3p, Ede1p, and mouse Eps15. Residues chosen for mutagenesis are highlighted in red. Residues conserved highly and moderately throughout the family are indicated in black and gray, respectively. (B) The end3 mutant was temperature sensitive for growth at 39°C. A dilution series of cells was plated on YPD medium and incubated at 25, 37, or 39°C. (C) Average lifetimes of Pan1-GFP and End3-GFP ± SD in wild-type and mutant cells. Data were taken from 2-min movies with a 1-s frame interval. n = 50 patches for each strain. **p < 0.001. (D) Quantification of fluorescence intensity (red) and distance from site of patch formation (blue) as a function of time for patches of indicated GFP-tagged proteins. Each curve represents data from one patch. Behavior of three independent patches was plotted for each strain. (E) Distribution of Ede1-GFP and Ede1EH-GFP patch lifetimes. Movies were taken with a 1-s frame interval. n = 50 patches for each strain.
FIGURE 2:Dynamics of the Sla1p patch and actin patch in EH domain mutants. (A) Average lifetimes of Sla1-GFP (left) and Abp1-mRFP (right) ± SD for indicated strains. Data were taken from 2-min movies with a 1-s frame interval. n = 50 patches for each strain. **p < 0.001. (B) Left, localizations of Sla1-GFP and Abp1-mRFP in live cells. Middle, kymograph representations of Sla1-GFP and Abp1-mRFP from the boxed area of strains as indicated. Right, quantification of fluorescence intensity (blue) and distance from the site of patch formation (red) as a function of time for patches of Sla1-GFP. Each curve represents data from one patch. Behavior of three independent patches was plotted for each strain. All movies were taken with a 1-s frame interval for both Sla1-GFP and Abp1-mRFP. The data in A were imaged as single-color movies using optimal GFP filter sets, whereas those in B were imaged as two-color simultaneous movies using narrow band-pass filter sets to completely separate GFP and mRFP fluorescence. Scale bars, 2 μm.
FIGURE 3:Redundant function of EH mutants in endocytic patch formation. (A) The pan1 and triple mutants were temperature sensitive for growth at 37°C. A dilution series of cells was plated on YPD medium and incubated at the indicated temperature. (B) Patch lifetimes of Sla1-GFP (top) and Abp1-mRFP (bottom) ± SD in the indicated strains. Data were obtained from 2-min movies taken with a 1-s frame interval. n = 50 patches for each strain. **p < 0.001. (C) Left, localization of Sla1-GFP and Abp1-mRFP from the strains indicated. Middle, kymograph representations of Sla1-GFP and Abp1-mRFP from the boxed area for the indicated times. Right, quantification of fluorescence intensity (blue) and distance from site of patch formation (red) as a function of time for patches of Sla1-GFP. Each curve represents data from one patch. Behavior of three independent patches was plotted for each strain. All movies were taken with a 1-s frame interval for both Sla1-GFP and Abp1-mRFP. Scale bars, 2 μm.
FIGURE 4:Localization of EH domain proteins in EH domain mutants. (A, C, E) Localization of Pan1-GFP (A), End3-GFP (C), and Ede1-GFP (E) in cells expressing mutant forms of other EH domain proteins. Right, kymographs from the same movies. (B, D) Average lifetimes of Pan1-GFP and End3-GFP ± SD in mutant cells. Data were taken from 2-min movies with a 1-s frame interval. n = 50 patches for each strain. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001. Scale bars, 2 μm. (F) Distribution of Ede1-GFP patch lifetimes in wild-type and indicated mutant cells. n = 50 patches for each strain. Movies were taken with a 1-s frame interval.
FIGURE 5:Effects of EH mutations on endocytic internalization. (A) Radiolabeled α-factor internalization assays performed on cells expressing the indicated strains at 25°C. Each curve represents the average of three independent experiments, and error bars indicate the SD at each time point. (B) A histogram representing the relative half-time of the α-factor internalization rate calculated from an exponential curve fit on the assay shown in A. Error bars indicate the SD from at least three experiments.
FIGURE 6:Dynamics of Syp1p patch in EH domain mutants. (A, B) Distribution of Syp1p patch lifetimes in the indicated single (A) or double and triple EH domain mutants (B). Data were taken from ∼13-min movies with a 4-s frame interval. (C) Average lifetimes of Syp1-GFP ± SD for indicated strains. (D) Left, localization of Syp1-3GFP from the indicated strains. Yellow bars mark where the kymograph was generated. Right, kymograph representations of Syp1-3GFP from 5-min movies. Scale bars, 2 μm.
FIGURE 7:Localization and temporal relationship of Syp1p and Sla1p patches in EH domain mutants. (A) Left, localization of Syp1-GFP and Sla1-mCherry (mCH) in live cells. Yellow bars mark where the kymograph was generated. Right, kymograph representations of Syp1-3GFP and Sla1-mCherry from 4- or 6-min movies. Arrowheads indicate examples of Syp1p patches that are joined by Sla1-mCherry. All movies were taken with a 3-s frame interval for both Syp1-GFP and Sla1-mCherry. Scale bars, 2 μm. (B) Temporal relationship of Syp1p, Sla1p, and Abp1p patches in EH domain mutants. Average time was obtained from at least 30 independent patches.
FIGURE 8:All Syp1p patches are eventually internalized in triple mutants. (A) Epifluorescence images of a single cell coexpressing Syp1-3GFP and Abp1-mRFP. Yellow bars mark where the kymograph was generated. Right, kymograph representations of Syp1-3GFP and Abp1-mRFP from 3-min movies. Arrowheads indicate examples of Syp1p patches that are joined by Abp1-mRFP. Scale bars, 2 μm. (B) Percentage of the Syp1-3GFP patches that were eventually joined by Abp1-mRFP. (C, D) Maximum-intensity projections of Z stacks of wild-type and triple-mutant cells labeled with Syp1-3GFP (C) or Abp1-mRFP (D). The Z series was acquired through the entire cell at 0.2-μm intervals. Dotted lines represent outline of cells. Quantification of Syp1-3GFP or actin patches/μm2 ± SD in wild-type and triple mutant cells (n = 50 cells for each strain). Scale bars, 2 μm.
FIGURE 9:Effects of EH domain mutations on endocytic proteins. (A) Localization of GFP-tagged endocytic proteins in wild-type and triple-mutant cells. Two strains were mixed and acquired in the same images. Only wild-type cells were labeled with FM4-64 in the right-hand images. Arrowheads indicate triple mutant cells. (B) The relative maximum fluorescence intensities of indicated GFP-fused proteins at cortical patches. Intensities of individual patches were compared in the same image by mixing wild-type and triple-mutant cells, which were distinguishable from FM4-64-treated wild-type cells. The values of intensities for wild-type and triple-mutant cells were divided by the mean for patch intensities in wild-type cells (n = 30), and the resulting values were multiplied by 100. Each open circle and horizontal red line represents intensity of a single patch and the mean of the intensities, respectively. (C) Patch lifetimes ± SD of GFP-tagged endocytic proteins in wild-type and triple mutant cells. Data were obtained from ∼3-min movies taken with a 1-s frame interval. n = 50 patches for each strain. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.
Yeast strains.
| Strain | Genotype | Source |
|---|---|---|
| JJTY0011 | Toshima lab | |
| JJTY0059 | Toshima lab | |
| JJTY0147 | Toshima lab | |
| JJTY0318 | Toshima lab | |
| JJTY0369 | Toshima lab | |
| JJTY0393 | Toshima lab | |
| JJTY0943 | This study | |
| JJTY0950 | This study | |
| JJTY0954 | This study | |
| JJTY0958 | This study | |
| JJTY0960 | This study | |
| JJTY0962 | This study | |
| JJTY0972 | This study | |
| JJTY0976 | This study | |
| JJTY0979 | This study | |
| JJTY0982 | This study | |
| JJTY0983 | This study | |
| JJTY1074 | This study | |
| JJTY1075 | This study | |
| JJTY1077 | This study | |
| JJTY1079 | This study | |
| JJTY1080 | This study | |
| JJTY1081 | This study | |
| JJTY1083 | This study | |
| JJTY1085 | This study | |
| JJTY1087 | This study | |
| JJTY1088 | This study | |
| JJTY1089 | This study | |
| JJTY1090 | This study | |
| JJTY1091 | This study | |
| JJTY1227 | This study | |
| JJTY1255 | This study | |
| JJTY1256 | This study | |
| JJTY1257 | This study | |
| JJTY1258 | This study | |
| JJTY1259 | This study | |
| JJTY1262 | This study | |
| JJTY1263 | This study | |
| JJTY1928 | This study | |
| JJTY1929 | This study | |
| JJTY1930 | This study | |
| JJTY1931 | This study | |
| JJTY1932 | This study | |
| JJTY1933 | This study | |
| JJTY1934 | This study | |
| JJTY1935 | This study | |
| JJTY1936 | This study | |
| JJTY1937 | This study | |
| JJTY1938 | This study | |
| JJTY1939 | This study | |
| JJTY1940 | This study | |
| JJTY2421 | This study | |
| JJTY2422 | This study | |
| JJTY2423 | This study | |
| JJTY2424 | This study | |
| JJTY2426 | This study | |
| JJTY2427 | This study | |
| JJTY2428 | This study | |
| JJTY2429 | This study | |
| JJTY2430 | This study | |
| JJTY2431 | This study | |
| JJTY2432 | This study | |
| JJTY2433 | This study | |
| JJTY2434 | This study |