Literature DB >> 22190197

Poly(ε-caprolactone)/nano fluoridated hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: in vitro degradation and biocompatibility study.

N Johari1, M H Fathi, M A Golozar, E Erfani, A Samadikuchaksaraei.   

Abstract

In this study, biodegradation and biocompatibility of novel poly(ε-caparolactone)/nano fluoridated hydroxyapatite (PCL-FHA) scaffolds were investigated. The FHA nanopowders were prepared via mechanical alloying method and had a chemical composition of Ca(10)(PO(4))(6)OH(2-x )F(x) (where x values were selected equal to 0.5 and 2.0). In order to fabricate PCL-FHA scaffolds, 10, 20, 30 and 40 wt% of the FHA were added to the PCL. The PCL-FHA scaffolds were produced by the solvent casting/particulate leaching using sodium chloride particles (with diameters of 300-500 μm) as the porogen. The phase structure, microstructure and morphology of the scaffolds were evaluated using X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy techniques. Porosity of the scaffolds was measured using the Archimedes' Principle. In vitro degradation of PCL-FHA scaffolds was studied by incubating the samples in phosphate buffered saline at 37°C and pH 7.4 for 30 days. Moreover, biocompatibility was evaluated by MTT assay after seeding and culture of osteoblast-like cells on the scaffolds. Results showed that the osteoblast-like cells attached to and proliferated on PCL-FHA and increasing the porosity of the scaffolds increased the cell viability. Also, degradation rate of scaffolds were increased with increasing the fluorine content in scaffolds composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22190197     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-011-4528-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  15 in total

1.  Differences in solubility of two types of heterogeneous fluoridated hydroxyapatites.

Authors:  M Okazaki; H Tohda; T Yanagisawa; M Taira; J Takahashi
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998 Apr-May       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Langer; J P Vacanti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Comparative dissolution studies on human enamel and fluorapatite.

Authors:  J E Tyler
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Stability and cellular responses to fluorapatite-collagen composites.

Authors:  Byung-Ho Yoon; Hae-Won Kim; Su-Hee Lee; Chang-Jun Bae; Young-Hag Koh; Young-Min Kong; Hyoun-Ee Kim
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  The osteoporosis revolution.

Authors:  L G Raisz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Thermal and chemical stability of fluorohydroxyapatite ceramics with different fluorine contents.

Authors:  Yanming Chen; Xigeng Miao
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Dental fluorosis: chemistry and biology.

Authors:  T Aoba; O Fejerskov
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  2002

8.  Development of an electrospun nano-apatite/PCL composite membrane for GTR/GBR application.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Sanne K Both; Xuechao Yang; X Frank Walboomers; John A Jansen
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Preparation and characterization of bioactive mesoporous wollastonite - Polycaprolactone composite scaffold.

Authors:  Jie Wei; Fangping Chen; Jung-Woog Shin; Hua Hong; Chenglong Dai; Jiancan Su; Changsheng Liu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Three-dimensional degradable porous polymer-ceramic matrices for use in bone repair.

Authors:  J E Devin; M A Attawia; C T Laurencin
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.517

View more
  6 in total

1.  Enhanced biomedical applicability of ZrO2-SiO2 ceramic composites in 3D printed bone scaffolds.

Authors:  Chih-Hao Chang; Chih-Yang Lin; Chih-Hung Chang; Fwu-Hsing Liu; Yu-Tzu Huang; Yunn-Shiuan Liao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Novel chitosan hydrogel formed by ethylene glycol chitosan, 1,6-diisocyanatohexan and polyethylene glycol-400 for tissue engineering scaffold: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Zhu Chen; Ming Zhao; Kang Liu; Yuqing Wan; Xudong Li; Gang Feng
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Patient-Derived Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells From Gingival Fibroblasts Composited With Defined Nanohydroxyapatite/Chitosan/Gelatin Porous Scaffolds as Potential Bone Graft Substitutes.

Authors:  Jun Ji; Xin Tong; Xiaofeng Huang; Junfeng Zhang; Haiyan Qin; Qingang Hu
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 4.  A glance at methods for cleft palate repair.

Authors:  Sima Tavakolinejad; Alireza Ebrahimzadeh Bidskan; Hami Ashraf; Daryoush Hamidi Alamdari
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 0.611

5.  Preparation of porous materials by selective enzymatic degradation: effect of in vitro degradation and in vivo compatibility.

Authors:  Ke Shi; Qinqin Ma; Tingting Su; Zhanyong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Development of Biodegradable Composites Using Polycaprolactone and Bamboo Powder.

Authors:  Satya Guha Nukala; Ing Kong; Vipulkumar Ishvarbhai Patel; Akesh Babu Kakarla; Wei Kong; Oliver Buddrick
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.967

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.