Literature DB >> 22189711

Bone marrow- and subcutaneous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells: differences and similarities.

Renata I Dmitrieva1, Izida R Minullina, Anna A Bilibina, Olga V Tarasova, Sergey V Anisimov, Andrey Y Zaritskey.   

Abstract

Bone marrow (BM) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (Ad) are both considered being prospective sources of MSC for therapeutic applications. However, functional properties and therapeutic efficacy of MSC derived from different tissues of the same patient are still poorly investigated. In our study, BM-MSC and F-MSC cultures from 43 adult donors were evaluated in successive passages for immunophenotype, secretion of VEGF, SDF1, MCP1, IL6 and TGFβ1, frequency of colony-forming units (CFU-F), frequency of adipo- and osteo-progenitors (CFU-Ad, CFU-Ost), and for onset of in vitro replicative senescence. We have demonstrated that at early passages (P2-P4 or up to 14-15 in vitro population doublings) BM- and Ad- derived MSC cultures are comparable in such important characteristics as proliferation rate (population doubling time: 3.4±0.2% in BM-MSC, 3±0.3% in F-MSC), clonogenity (CFU-F frequency: 32±5% in BM-MSC, 31±5% in F-MSC), differentiation potential (CFU-Ad frequency: 10.4±2% in BM-MSC, 13±3% in F-MSC; CFU-Ost frequency: 18.5±5.5% in BM-MSC, 18±5% in F-MSC), but differ significantly in abundance of CD146⁺ fraction within the sample (25±5% in BM-MSC, 7±3% in F-MSC) and in a level of VEGF, SDF-1, MCP1 and TGFβ1 secretion. We have also demonstrated that BM-MSC enter senescence after P3-4 while most of F-MSC did not show senescence features up to P6-8. Together, these data demonstrate that specific properties of MSC from different sources should be always taken into account, when developing and optimizing the specific protocols for MSC expansion and evaluation for each particular clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22189711     DOI: 10.4161/cc.11.2.18858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  63 in total

1.  Chorion Mesenchymal Stem Cells Show Superior Differentiation, Immunosuppressive, and Angiogenic Potentials in Comparison With Haploidentical Maternal Placental Cells.

Authors:  Paz L González; Catalina Carvajal; Jimena Cuenca; Francisca Alcayaga-Miranda; Fernando E Figueroa; Jorge Bartolucci; Lorena Salazar-Aravena; Maroun Khoury
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  A slowly proliferating subpopulation in human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in culture.

Authors:  Xing-Ai Ju; Jin Chen; Li Ding; Yu-Zhi Li; Feng-Jun Xiao; Zhan-Quan Li; Zi-Kuan Guo
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  Biomechanical Screening of Cell Therapies for Vocal Fold Scar.

Authors:  Rebecca S Bartlett; Joel D Gaston; Tom Y Yen; Shuyun Ye; Christina Kendziorski; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Direct head-to-head comparison of cationic liposome-mediated gene delivery to mesenchymal stem/stromal cells of different human sources: a comprehensive study.

Authors:  Joana S Boura; Francisco Dos Santos; Jeffrey M Gimble; Carla M P Cardoso; Catarina Madeira; Joaquim M S Cabral; Cláudia Lobato da Silva
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther Methods       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.396

Review 5.  Mesenchymal stem cell subpopulations: phenotype, property and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Miaohua Mo; Shan Wang; Ying Zhou; Hong Li; Yaojiong Wu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  Impact of tissue-specific stem cells on lineage-specific differentiation: a focus on the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Tyler Pizzute; Kevin Lynch; Ming Pei
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  Sublethal heat shock induces premature senescence rather than apoptosis in human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Larisa L Alekseenko; Victoria I Zemelko; Alisa P Domnina; Olga G Lyublinskaya; Valery V Zenin; Nataly A Pugovkina; Irina V Kozhukharova; Alexandra V Borodkina; Tatiana M Grinchuk; Irina I Fridlyanskaya; Nikolay N Nikolsky
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.667

8.  MicroRNA-218 competes with differentiation media in the induction of osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cell by regulating β-catenin inhibitors.

Authors:  Zohreh Karimi; Ehsan Seyedjafari; Arash Khojasteh; Seyed Mahmoud Hashemi; Bahram Kazemi; Samira Mohammadi-Yeganeh
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Robust, efficient, and practical electrogene transfer method for human mesenchymal stem cells using square electric pulses.

Authors:  Aaron Liew; Franck M André; Léa L Lesueur; Marie-Amélie De Ménorval; Timothy O'Brien; Lluis M Mir
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther Methods       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.396

10.  The effect of bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on myocardial remodelling in the rat model of ischaemic heart failure.

Authors:  Andrey A Karpov; Yulia K Uspenskaya; Sarkis M Minasian; Maxim V Puzanov; Renata I Dmitrieva; Anna A Bilibina; Sergey V Anisimov; Michael M Galagudza
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.