Literature DB >> 2218882

Is DNA ploidy of prognostic significance in stage I cutaneous melanoma?

P Gattuso1, V Reddy, E Solans, S Kathuria, G V Aranha, H K Jacobs, J Walloch.   

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that the presence of DNA aneuploidy in stage I cutaneous melanoma carries a poor prognosis. To see if our experience correlated with these reports, we used DNA analysis by flow cytometry of propidium iodide-stained nuclei disaggregated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue of biopsy specimens to retrospectively study 55 patients who had cutaneous stage I melanomas. The patients had been treated from 1977 to 1987 with a mean follow-up of 5.4 years. Thirty-nine (71%) of the 55 histograms were diploid, and 16 (29%) of the histograms were aneuploid. DNA content was significantly associated with other conventional prognostic factors, including growth pattern, ulceration, pathologic stage, tumor thickness, and Clark's level. DNA aneuploidy was significantly related to disease-free survival and predicted a poorer prognosis (p less than 0.05), but when stratified for tumor thickness it lost significance. A multivariate discriminant function analysis of 12 factors in melanoma showed six factors to be independently significant in determining prognosis. DNA content (p = 0.034) ranked fifth in importance behind growth pattern (p less than 0.001), ulceration (p less than 0.001), thickness (p = 0.001), and pathologic stage (p less than 0.005). DNA content, although significantly associated with conventional prognostic factors and disease-free survival, is not the best indicator of biologic behavior of melanomas in this study. Further investigation into its usefulness is necessary before DNA content can become a routine diagnostic modality in the work-up of stage I cutaneous melanomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2218882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  6 in total

1.  A primary melanoma and its asynchronous metastasis highlight the role of BRAF, CDKN2A, and TERT.

Authors:  Gregory A Hosler; Teresa Davoli; Ilgen Mender; Brandon Litzner; Jaehyuk Choi; Payal Kapur; Jerry W Shay; Richard C Wang
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 1.587

2.  Surgical management and prognostic factors in patients with subungual melanoma.

Authors:  K M Heaton; A el-Naggar; L G Ensign; M I Ross; C M Balch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Prognostic significance in malignant melanoma of nuclear DNA content measured by a microfluorimetric method.

Authors:  Y Umebayashi; F Otsuka
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.017

4.  Tumour growth rate and DNA flow cytometry parameters as prognostic factors in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  T Muhonen; S Pyrhönen; A Laasonen; V M Wasenius; S Asko-Seljavaara; K Franssila; L Kangas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Mitotic rate and S-phase fraction as prognostic factors in stage I cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Authors:  J M Karjalainen; M J Eskelinen; S Nordling; P K Lipponen; E M Alhava; V M Kosma
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction as prognostic factors in patients with uveal melanomas.

Authors:  M Karlsson; B Boeryd; J Carstensen; B Kågedal; S Wingren
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.