Literature DB >> 22188709

Long-term efficacy of upstream therapy with lipophilic or hydrophilic statins on antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: comparison between atorvastatin and pravastatin.

Takashi Komatsu1, Hideaki Tachibana, Yoshihiro Sato, Mahito Ozawa, Fusanori Kunugita, Motoyuki Nakamura.   

Abstract

There is little information available on the benefits of selection of statins as upstream therapy for the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin (A-group, n = 43) and pravastatin (P-group, n = 41) as upstream therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF and dyslipidemia. A total of 84 patients (45 men, mean age, 66 ± 9 years, mean follow-up, 49 ± 32 months) were retrospectively assigned to receive atorvastatin (n = 41;10 mg/day) or pravastatin (n = 43 ; 10 mg/day). Survival rates free from AF recurrence at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months were 93%, 74%, 60%, and 53% in A-group, and 88%, 49%, 37%, and 29%, respectively, in P-group (P = 0.029, A-group versus P-group). Survival rates free from conversion to permanent AF at 12, 36, 60, and 90 months were 100%, 100%, 98%, and 95% in A-group, and 100%, 95%, 88%, and 83%, respectively, in P-group (P = 0.063, A-group versus P-group). Using a logistic regression model, atorvastatin was found to be associated with a significantly reduced risk of AF recurrence in comparison to pravastatin (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.68, P = 0.005). This association remained significant after adjustment for potentially confounding variables (OR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.86, P = 0.027). Using a logistic regression model, atorvastatin was not associated with a significantly reduced risk of converting to permanent AF in comparison to pravastatin (unadjusted OR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.05-1.50, P = 0.138), but this association did show a significant difference after adjustment for potentially confounding variables in a multivariate model (OR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.06-0.96, P = 0.046). Adverse effects requiring discontinuation of statins were observed in 1 case (2%, myalgia) in A-group, and 1 case (2%, elevation in CPK level ≥ 500 IU/L) in P-group, respectively (P = NS, A-group versus P-group). Atorvastatin, a lipophilic statin, was considered to be more effective in preventing recurrence of paroxysmal AF and conversion to permanent AF than pravastatin, a hydrophilic statin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22188709     DOI: 10.1536/ihj.52.359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Heart J        ISSN: 1349-2365            Impact factor:   1.862


  6 in total

1.  The statin-iron nexus: anti-inflammatory intervention for arterial disease prevention.

Authors:  Leo R Zacharski; Ralph G DePalma; Galina Shamayeva; Bruce K Chow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Nitric oxide synthases and atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Ingrid M Bonilla; Arun Sridhar; Sandor Györke; Arturo J Cardounel; Cynthia A Carnes
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  The Different Cardiovascular Outcomes Between Long-Term Efficacy of Hydrophilic and Lipophilic Statin Therapy in Both Asian Diabetic Sexes.

Authors:  Shang-Yi Li; Hsin-Hung Chen; Cheng-Li Lin; Su-Yin Yeh; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 4.  Statin Therapy in Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation: Focus on the Anti-Inflammatory Effects.

Authors:  Homa Nomani; Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour; Željko Reiner; Tannaz Jamialahmadi; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2021-02-26

5.  Association of venous thromboembolism between hydrophilic and lipophilic statin users among diabetic subjects.

Authors:  Wei-Syun Hu; Cheng-Li Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Statin Therapy for Primary Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation: Guided by CHADS2/CHA2DS2VASc Score.

Authors:  Chen-Ying Hung; Yu-Cheng Hsieh; Jin-Long Huang; Ching-Heng Lin; Tsu-Juey Wu
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.243

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.