| Literature DB >> 22187930 |
Abstract
Philosophers have mostly advocated that advance directives should bear the same authority, with regard to refusal of life-extending treatment, as a patient's contemporaneous consent or refusal. Such authors typically support this position through a theory of persistent personal identity. I agree that the loss of mental competence does not render someone a moral stranger to their prior goal but argue that equating advance direction with consent is to ignore the capacity of nonpersons to attribute and withhold moral value. A distinction should be drawn between advance directives that seek to pursue deeply held goals and those that express contempt for the mentally incompetent.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22187930 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2011.0017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kennedy Inst Ethics J ISSN: 1054-6863