Literature DB >> 2218633

The blood transfusion taboo of Jehovah's Witnesses: origin, development and function of a controversial doctrine.

R Singelenberg1.   

Abstract

Jehovah's Witnesses are not allowed to accept a blood transfusion. According to the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society this therapy is a transgression of divine precepts. Additionally, in the judgement of the believers, secular proof is abundant these days; to them AIDS is a powerful justification to abstain from blood. Founded on the work of the anthropologist Mary Douglas, it is argued that the rejection of this medical therapy is based on perceptions of pollution and purity inherent in the Watch Tower Society's ideological concept of anti-worldliness. Rooted in the movement's pre-war opposition to vaccination the implementation of the taboo was triggered by the prevailing social-political climate surrounding the Society during the Second World War, resulting in this intriguing and controversial religious proscription. For the community of Jehovah's Witnesses the blood transfusion taboo still functions as a significant mechanism of sectarian boundary maintenance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship; Religious Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2218633     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90048-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  4 in total

1.  Refusal of treatment by an adolescent: the deliverances of different consciences.

Authors:  S L Webb; M F Marshall; F Boettcher; M Perlmutter
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1998-03

Review 2.  Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 1. Should bioethical deliberation consider dissidents' views?

Authors:  O Muramoto
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Refusal of Medical Blood Transfusions Among Jehovah's Witnesses: Emotion Regulation of the Dissonance of Saving and Sacrificing Life.

Authors:  Hege Kristin Ringnes; Harald Hegstad
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2016-10

4.  Are there morally relevant differences between hymen restoration and bloodless treatment for Jehovah's Witnesses?

Authors:  Niklas Juth; Niels Lynøe
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.