Literature DB >> 22185541

Reporting rates of ectopic pregnancy: are we any closer to achieving consensus?

P de Rosnay1, L M Irvine.   

Abstract

Calculating rates of ectopic pregnancy in a reliable and reproducible way can be challenging. To date, there is no consensus as to which denominators to use but the authors suggest using the total number of deliveries as a benchmark. In many developing countries where ectopic pregnancy is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, standardisation of epidemiological data is arguably even more important. Using the number of deliveries is probably the most pragmatic and reliable way of quoting ectopic pregnancy rates in developing countries, as structures are usually already in place to record births/deliveries. This would ensure greater consistency and allow more meaningful comparisons to be made, both within individual units over time as well as globally. Using additional denominators is more labour intensive and lends itself to inaccuracy but may nevertheless be useful depending on the issues being addressed. Ultimately, the correct denominator(s) to use should be determined by the clinical question(s) of interest. The authors acknowledge that the statistical analysis used in this paper is based on one retrospective study alone and that further work is required in this area before definitive conclusions can be made.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22185541     DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2011.618894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  1 in total

1.  The impact of tubal ectopic pregnancy in Papua New Guinea--a retrospective case review.

Authors:  Nancy N Hamura; John W Bolnga; Regina Wangnapi; Andrew W Horne; Stephen J Rogerson; Holger W Unger
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.007

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.