Literature DB >> 22185492

Closing the gates to consciousness: distractors activate a central inhibition process.

Michael Niedeggen1, Lars Michael, Guido Hesselmann.   

Abstract

The paradigm of distractor-induced blindness has previously been used to track the transition from unconscious to conscious visual processing. In a variation of this paradigm used in this study, participants (n = 13) had to detect an orientation change of tilted bars (target) embedded in a dynamic random pattern; the onset of the target was signaled by the presentation of a color cue. Occasional orientation changes preceding the cue served as distractors and severely impaired the target's detection. ERPs showed that a frontal negativity was cumulatively activated by the distractors, and early sensory components were not affected. In a control condition, the target was defined by a coherent motion of the bars. Orientation changes preceding the motion target did not affect its detection, and the frontal suppression process was not observed. However, we obtained a significant reduction of the sensory components. The data support the notion that distractors that share the target's features trigger a cumulative inhibition process preventing the conscious representation of the inhibited features. Explorative source modeling suggests that this process originates in the pFC. A top-down modulation of sensory processing could not be observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22185492     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Bilingualism and the increased attentional blink effect: evidence that the difference between bilinguals and monolinguals generalizes to different levels of second language proficiency.

Authors:  Vatsala Khare; Ark Verma; Bhoomika Kar; Narayanan Srinivasan; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-11-30

2.  Are auditory cues special? Evidence from cross-modal distractor-induced blindness.

Authors:  Lea Kern; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Error Rates in the Distractor-Induced Deafness Paradigm.

Authors:  Lars Michael; Ana Böke; Henry Ipczynski
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-04

4.  Might cortical hyper-responsiveness in aging contribute to Alzheimer's disease?

Authors:  Michael S Jacob; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?

Authors:  Gesche N Winther; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

6.  Neural Correlates of Conscious Motion Perception.

Authors:  Gonzalo Boncompte; Diego Cosmelli
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Get Set or Get Distracted? Disentangling Content-Priming and Attention-Catching Effects of Background Lure Stimuli on Identifying Targets in Two Simultaneously Presented Series.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Kamila Śmigasiewicz; Lars Michael; Laura Heikaus; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.