Literature DB >> 22184750

Low-frequency ultrasound (20-40 kHz) as an adjunctive therapy for chronic wound healing: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials.

Jeffrey Voigt1, Martin Wendelken, Vickie Driver, Oscar M Alvarez.   

Abstract

Ultrasound as a therapeutic agent in chronic wound healing has been studied extensively. This systematic review and meta-analysis specifically examines low-frequency (20-30 kHz) ultrasound delivered at either low or high intensity. The objective of this review was to determine whether low-frequency ultrasound used as an adjunctive therapy improves the outcomes of complete healing and reduction of size of chronic lower limb wounds. PubMed, Cochrane/CENTRAL, technical assessment, relevant wound-related journals, and clinical guidelines were searched along with contacting manufacturers and authors of relevant randomized controlled trials were completed. Searches focused on the use of low-frequency ultrasound in randomized controlled trials. Data were collected via a data collection form and was adjudicated independently via coauthors. Meta-analyses and heterogeneity checks were performed using Mantel-Haenszel and inverse variance (fixed and random effects) statistical methods on studies with similar outcomes (complete healing and percent wound area reduction) over similar time periods. Single study results were reported via the statistical methods used in the study. Eight randomized controlled trials were identified. Results demonstrated that early healing (at ≤5 months) in patients with venous stasis and diabetic foot ulcers was favorably influenced by both high- and low-intensity ultrasound delivered at a low frequency-either via contact or noncontact techniques. However, the quality of the data may be suspect, especially for low-frequency low-intensity noncontact ultrasound because of significant biases. In patients presenting with either venous stasis or diabetic foot ulcers (Wagner classification 1-3), early healing appears to be facilitated by either low-frequency low-intensity noncontact ultrasound or low-frequency high-intensity contact ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22184750     DOI: 10.1177/1534734611424648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Low Extrem Wounds        ISSN: 1534-7346            Impact factor:   2.057


  17 in total

Review 1.  Does physical therapy and rehabilitation improve outcomes for diabetic foot ulcers?

Authors:  Yasemin Turan; Bulent M Ertugrul; Benjamin A Lipsky; Kevser Bayraktar
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-20

Review 2.  New techniques for wound debridement.

Authors:  Brijesh M Madhok; Kathryn Vowden; Peter Vowden
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  The ABC's of wound care.

Authors:  Kelly Bumpus; Michael A Maier
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Sonothrombolysis in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Kristian Barlinn; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  The effect of 22.5 kHz low-frequency contact ultrasound debridement (LFCUD) on lower extremity wound healing for a vascular surgery population: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christine Anne Murphy; Pamela Houghton; Tim Brandys; Gregory Rose; Dianne Bryant
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Low-Frequency Ultrasound Debridement in Chronic Wound Healing: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.

Authors:  Ying-Ju Ruby Chang; Julie Perry; Karen Cross
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 7.  Seeking effective interventions to treat complex wounds: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Jesmin Antony; Afshin Vafaei; Paul A Khan; Alana Harrington; Elise Cogo; Charlotte Wilson; Laure Perrier; Wing Hui; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Low-intensity vibration improves angiogenesis and wound healing in diabetic mice.

Authors:  Eileen M Weinheimer-Haus; Stefan Judex; William J Ennis; Timothy J Koh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of healing rate in diabetes-related foot ulcers with low frequency ultrasonic debridement versus non-surgical sharps debridement: a randomised trial protocol.

Authors:  Lucia Michailidis; Cylie M Williams; Shan M Bergin; Terry P Haines
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Treatment of cartilage defects by Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in a sheep model.

Authors:  Parviz Vahedi; Hassan Hosainzadegan; Bala Brazvan; Leila Roshangar; Hajar Shafaei; Ramin Salimnejad
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 1.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.