Literature DB >> 22184677

Comparison of radiological measures for diagnosing flatfoot.

Huan-Chu Lo1, Wen-Cheng Chu, Wei-Kai Wu, Hsin Hsieh, Chieh-Ping Chou, Shao-En Sun, Pin-Ya Chou, Chen-Hui Liao, Xiao-Yun Guan, Shu-Chee Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Taiwanese military, flatfoot is indicated by a calcaneal-fifth metatarsal angle (arch angle) ≥165°. However, the arch angle is not always easily defined.
PURPOSE: To assess correlations between the arch angle and other radiographic measures and thus identify an alternative radiographic measure for diagnosing flatfoot.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-seven male Taiwanese military recruits were studied (median age 22 years, interquartile range 20-23 years). Lateral, weight-bearing radiographs were taken. Five radiographic measurements, including the calcaneal-fifth metatarsal angle (arch angle), medial arch angle (MAA), calcaneal pitch angle (CP), talus angle (TA), and talar-first metatarsal angle (TFM) were made. Correlations between the arch angle and all other measures were determined. A cut-off value for predicting flatfoot (arch angle ≥165°) was determined for each measure using the Youden index and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for each measure to assess diagnostic accuracy.
RESULTS: All measures were significantly correlated with arch angle (P < 0.05); however, the strongest correlation was for CP (ρ = -0.905, P < 0.001). CP was associated with the highest area under the ROC (0.988 vs. 0.711-0.912 for the other measures). Further, CP (cut-off <12.3°) had the highest sensitivity (92.0%), positive predictive value (76.7%), and negative predictive value (96.5%). TFM (>9.5°) had the highest specificity (90.3% vs. 88.75 for CP <12.3°).
CONCLUSION: CP is inversely correlated with arch angle in Taiwanese male military recruits. CP < 12.3° is a significant predictor of flatfoot. Assessment of CP may be used as an alternative means of diagnosing flatfoot when the arch angle is not easily defined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22184677     DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.110387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of the calcaneal pitch angle and modified projection area per length squared method for medial longitudinal arch evaluation of the foot.

Authors:  Ilgaz Akdoğan; Semih Akkaya; Nuray Akkaya; Esat Kıter
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.021

2.  Correlation of foot posture index with plantar pressure and radiographic measurements in pediatric flatfoot.

Authors:  Jung Su Lee; Ki Beom Kim; Jin Ook Jeong; Na Yeon Kwon; Sang Mi Jeong
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-02-28

3.  Correlation between radiographic morphometry and body surface somatometry for foot arches.

Authors:  Yosuke Maruyama; Katsutoshi Itsukaichi; Satoko Tanabe; Takayuki Nakagomi; Tomohiro Matsuyama; Hiroyuki Sasaki
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2019-11-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.