Literature DB >> 22184297

Splenic vein-inferior mesenteric vein anastomosis to lessen left-sided portal hypertension after pancreaticoduodenectomy with concomitant vascular resection.

Nélio Ferreira1, Elie Oussoultzoglou, Pascal Fuchshuber, Dimitrios Ntourakis, Masato Narita, Mudassir Rather, Edoardo Rosso, Pietro Addeo, Patrick Pessaux, Daniel Jaeck, Philippe Bachellier.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: A splenic vein (SV)-inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) anastomosis reduces congestion of the stomach and spleen after pancreaticoduodenectomy with resection of the SV-mesenteric vein confluence but carries a risk of left-sided venous hypertension.
DESIGN: Comparative retrospective study.
SETTING: Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. PATIENTS: From January 1, 2002, to February 28, 2010, 39 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with resection of the SV-mesenteric vein confluence for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. All patients had a terminoterminal portal vein-superior mesenteric vein anastomosis. The SV blood flow into the portal vein was preserved in 11 patients by reimplantation of the SV into the portal vein. Sixteen patients underwent surgical reconstruction of the SV-IMV confluence by anastomosis (group 1), and in 12 patients the natural SV-IMV confluence was preserved (group 2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative spleen volume and platelet count.
RESULTS: Demographic characteristics, preoperative tumor staging, pathological outcome, and postoperative complications were comparable in both groups. There was no difference in platelet count between groups 1 and 2 preoperatively (mean [SD], 293.13 [125.37] vs 241.09 [49.12] × 10(3)/μL [to convert to × 10(9)/L, multiply by 1.0], respectively; P = .21) or postoperatively (mean [SD], 231.75 [156.39] vs 164.31 [76.46] × 10(3)/μL, respectively; P = .32). Likewise, no difference was found in the spleen volume preoperatively (mean [SD], 258.96 [179.23] vs 237.31 [122.46] mL, respectively; P = .76) and on postoperative day 15 (mean [SD], 279.08 [158.10] vs 299.12 [153.11] mL, respectively; P = .78).
CONCLUSION: Early assessment shows that SV-IMV anastomosis is as feasible and as safe as the preservation of a natural SV-IMV confluence in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22184297     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  9 in total

1.  “Pattern of venous collateral development after splenic vein occlusion in an extended whipple procedure”.

Authors:  Safi Dokmak
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Pattern of Venous Collateral Development after Splenic Vein Occlusion in an Extended Whipple Procedure (Whipple at the Splenic Artery) and Long-Term Results.

Authors:  Ismael Dominguez Rosado; Sanjeev Bhalla; Luis A Sanchez; Ryan C Fields; William G Hawkins; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Management of bleeding gastric varices in patients with sinistral portal hypertension.

Authors:  Quanda Liu; Yang Song; Xiaoya Xu; Zhitao Jin; Weihong Duan; Ningxin Zhou
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Concomitant splenic artery ligation has no preventive effect on left-sided portal hypertension following pancreaticoduodenectomy with the resection of the portal and superior mesenteric vein confluence for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Gyoten; Shugo Mizuno; Motonori Nagata; Takahiro Ito; Aoi Hayasaki; Yasuhiro Murata; Akihiro Tanemura; Naohisa Kuriyama; Masashi Kishiwada; Hiroyuki Sakurai
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 5.  Management of the splenic vein during a pancreaticoduodenectomy with venous resection for malignancy.

Authors:  Pietro Addeo; Gennaro Nappo; Emanuele Felli; Constantin Oncioiu; François Faitot; Philippe Bachellier
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-09-20

6.  Indication for the use of an interposed graft during portal vein and/or superior mesenteric vein reconstruction in pancreatic resection based on perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Seiko Hirono; Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Ken-Ichi Okada; Motoki Miyazawa; Atsushi Shimizu; Yuji Kitahata; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Significance of Simultaneous Splenic Artery Resection in Left-Sided Portal Hypertension After Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Combined Portal Vein Resection.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Gyoten; Shugo Mizuno; Motonori Nagata; Toru Ogura; Masanobu Usui; Shuji Isaji
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Treatment of bleeding from a portion of pancreatojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy with division of the splenic vein: two case reports.

Authors:  Hiroki Kushiya; Takehiro Noji; Daisuke Abo; Takeshi Soyama; Kimitaka Tanaka; Yoshitsugu Nakanishi; Toshimichi Asano; Toru Nakamura; Takahiro Tsuchikawa; Keisuke Okamura; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-08-08

9.  Reconstructing spleno-mesenterico-portal cofluence by bifurcated allogeneic vein in local advanced pancreatic cancer-a feasible method to avoid left-sided portal hypertension.

Authors:  Xingmao Zhang; Qiao Wu; Hua Fan; Qiang He; Ren Lang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.