BACKGROUND: Developing effective and safe microbicides requires study procedures (e.g., technology used, abstinence requirements, and product use) that are acceptable to participants. METHODS: Thirty women completed 4 study visits including pelvic examination, colposcopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and semistructured, qualitative interviews. Additional requirements included abstinence (for approximately 16 days) and twice daily vaginal product use (for 5.5 days). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using framework analysis. Themes addressing OCT experiences, acceptability of abstinence, and vaginal product use were examined. RESULTS: OCT was viewed favorably as an imaging technology. Some women reported feeling the fiber-optic probe "poking" them and more than one-third spontaneously reported feeling pressure or pinching upon rotation of the speculum in connection with the OCT evaluation. Compliance with vaginal gel use was high, but for many women assigned to use a product containing nonoxynol-9 (vs. placebo), the postproduct use examination was more uncomfortable, relative to the initial examination or 1 week following product discontinuation. Nearly all women experienced product leakage; acceptability of leakage varied. Two women were not abstinent and several more found abstinence challenging. Some women involved their partner in decision making regarding trial enrollment. Strategies to remain abstinent included participating when the partner was away, avoiding early intimacy, and engaging in alternative sexual activities. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative interviews in early-phase studies provide insights and capture information that would be missed by behavioral inference alone. Understanding participant's experiences is important in order to provide anticipatory guidance and plan future microbicide studies that facilitate adherence with trial requirements.
BACKGROUND: Developing effective and safe microbicides requires study procedures (e.g., technology used, abstinence requirements, and product use) that are acceptable to participants. METHODS: Thirty women completed 4 study visits including pelvic examination, colposcopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and semistructured, qualitative interviews. Additional requirements included abstinence (for approximately 16 days) and twice daily vaginal product use (for 5.5 days). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using framework analysis. Themes addressing OCT experiences, acceptability of abstinence, and vaginal product use were examined. RESULTS: OCT was viewed favorably as an imaging technology. Some women reported feeling the fiber-optic probe "poking" them and more than one-third spontaneously reported feeling pressure or pinching upon rotation of the speculum in connection with the OCT evaluation. Compliance with vaginal gel use was high, but for many women assigned to use a product containing nonoxynol-9 (vs. placebo), the postproduct use examination was more uncomfortable, relative to the initial examination or 1 week following product discontinuation. Nearly all women experienced product leakage; acceptability of leakage varied. Two women were not abstinent and several more found abstinence challenging. Some women involved their partner in decision making regarding trial enrollment. Strategies to remain abstinent included participating when the partner was away, avoiding early intimacy, and engaging in alternative sexual activities. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative interviews in early-phase studies provide insights and capture information that would be missed by behavioral inference alone. Understanding participant's experiences is important in order to provide anticipatory guidance and plan future microbicide studies that facilitate adherence with trial requirements.
Authors: Kathleen L Vincent; Brent A Bell; Susan L Rosenthal; Lawrence R Stanberry; Nigel Bourne; Yvonne T Cosgrove Sweeney; Dorothy L Patton; Massoud Motamedi Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: K H Mayer; J Peipert; T Fleming; A Fullem; T Moench; S Cu-Uvin; M Bentley; M Chesney; Z Rosenberg Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2001-01-26 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Lut Van Damme; Roshini Govinden; Florence M Mirembe; Fernand Guédou; Suniti Solomon; Marissa L Becker; B S Pradeep; A K Krishnan; Michel Alary; Bina Pande; Gita Ramjee; Jennifer Deese; Tania Crucitti; Doug Taylor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P F Escobar; J L Belinson; A White; N M Shakhova; F I Feldchtein; M V Kareta; N D Gladkova Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Melissa Loza; Kathleen Vincent; Thomas Moench; Lawrence R Stanberry; Susan L Rosenthal Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 1.742