Literature DB >> 22183769

Assessment of free energy predictors for ligand binding to a methyllysine histone code reader.

Cen Gao1, J Martin Herold, Dmitri Kireev.   

Abstract

Methyllysine histone code readers constitute a new promising group of potential drug targets. For instance, L3MBTL1, a malignant brain tumor (MBT) protein, selectively binds mono- and di-methyllysine epigenetic marks (KMe, KMe(2) ) that eventually results in the negative regulation of multiple genes through the E2F/Rb oncogenic pathway. There is a pressing need in potent and selective small-molecule probes that would enable further target validation and might become therapeutic leads. Such an endeavor would require efficient tools to assess the free energy of protein-ligand binding. However, due to an unparalleled function of the MBT binding pocket (i.e., selective binding to KMe/KMe(2) ) and because of its distinctive structure representing a small aromatic "cage," an accurate assessment of its binding affinity to a ligand appears to be a challenging task. Here, we report a comparative analysis of computationally affordable affinity predictors applied to a set of seven small-molecule ligands interacting with L3MBTL1. The analysis deals with novel ligands and targets, but applies widespread computational approaches and intuitive comparison metrics that makes this study compatible with and incremental to earlier large scale accounts on the efficiency of affinity predictors. Ultimately, this study has revealed three top performers, far ahead of the other techniques, including two scoring functions, PMF04 and PLP, along with a simulation-based method MM-PB/SA. We discuss why some methods may perform better than others on this target class, the limits of their application, as well as how the efficiency of the most CPU-demanding techniques could be optimized.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22183769      PMCID: PMC3276689          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.22888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  37 in total

1.  Are free energy calculations useful in practice? A comparison with rapid scoring functions for the p38 MAP kinase protein system.

Authors:  D A Pearlman; P S Charifson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Yipin Lu; Xueliang Fang; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

3.  PMF scoring revisited.

Authors:  Ingo Muegge
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  L3MBTL1 recognition of mono- and dimethylated histones.

Authors:  Jinrong Min; Abdellah Allali-Hassani; Nataliya Nady; Chao Qi; Hui Ouyang; Yongsong Liu; Farrell MacKenzie; Masoud Vedadi; Cheryl H Arrowsmith
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-18       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  How to obtain statistically converged MM/GBSA results.

Authors:  Samuel Genheden; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  J Aqvist; C Medina; J E Samuelsson
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-03

7.  Addressing limitations with the MM-GB/SA scoring procedure using the WaterMap method and free energy perturbation calculations.

Authors:  Cristiano R W Guimarães; Alan M Mathiowetz
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Identification of non-peptide malignant brain tumor (MBT) repeat antagonists by virtual screening of commercially available compounds.

Authors:  Dmitri Kireev; Tim J Wigle; Jacqueline Norris-Drouin; J Martin Herold; William P Janzen; Stephen V Frye
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Validation and use of the MM-PBSA approach for drug discovery.

Authors:  Bernd Kuhn; Paul Gerber; Tanja Schulz-Gasch; Martin Stahl
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Histone H4 lysine 20 monomethylation promotes transcriptional repression by L3MBTL1.

Authors:  N Kalakonda; W Fischle; P Boccuni; N Gurvich; R Hoya-Arias; X Zhao; Y Miyata; D Macgrogan; J Zhang; J K Sims; J C Rice; S D Nimer
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Structure, Binding Affinity, and Biological Activity in the Epigenome.

Authors:  Balázs Zoltán Zsidó; Csaba Hetényi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.