Literature DB >> 22183499

Prospective outcome study of 360 patients treated with liposuction, lipoabdominoplasty, and abdominoplasty.

Eric Swanson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported data, including effects on quality of life, have not been previously prospectively evaluated in liposuction patients, or in abdominoplasty patients treated simultaneously with liposuction. This prospective outcome study was undertaken to evaluate and compare liposuction and abdominoplasty from the patient's perspective.
METHODS: From 2002 to 2007, in-person interviews were conducted with 360 patients who attended a follow-up appointment at least 1 month after surgery, from a total of 551 consecutive patients treated with ultrasonic liposuction and/or abdominoplasty (response rate, 65.3 percent). Questions were asked in six categories: patient data, indications, recovery, results, complications, and psychological effects. Responses were analyzed in three groups: liposuction alone (n = 219), combined liposuction and abdominoplasty (n = 128), and abdominoplasty alone (n = 13).
RESULTS: For most recovery indices, liposuction patients recovered significantly more quickly than lipoabdominoplasty patients (p ≤ 0.01) and had less discomfort (pain ratings, 6.1 of 10 and 7.5 of 10, respectively; p < 0.001). The result ratings for lipoabdominoplasty (9.0 of 10) and abdominoplasty (8.7 of 10) were higher than for liposuction alone (7.8 of 10; p < 0.001). Overall, 85.8 percent of patients reported improved self-esteem and 69.6 percent reported an improved quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: : Liposuction and abdominoplasty, either alone or in combination, provide high levels of patient satisfaction (88.8 percent overall). The combined procedure is similar in discomfort level to abdominoplasty alone (both 7.5 of 10) and produces the highest level of patient satisfaction (99.2 percent), with 97.6 percent of patients saying they would undergo the operation again and 99.2 percent recommending it to others. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22183499     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318244237f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

1.  Outcome studies in plastic surgery: knowing the objectives and avoiding pitfalls.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-01-08

2.  Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet.

Authors:  Grzegorz Zuk; Adrian Fernando Palma; Gertraud Eylert; Dimitri Aristotle Raptis; Merlin Guggenheim; Maziar Shafighi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-06-28

3.  Champagne Groove Lipectomy: A Safe Technique to Contour the Upper Abdomen in Abdominoplasty.

Authors:  Ron Brooks; Jonathan Nguyen; Saeed Chowdhry; John Paul Tutela; Sean Kelishadi; David Yonick; Joshua Choo; Bradon J Wilhelmi
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2017-03-06

4.  Managing Complications in Abdominoplasty: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Pedro Vidal; Juan Enrique Berner; Patrick A Will
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-09-15

5.  Abdominoplasty for treatment of abdominal gun-shot wound sequalae - A case report.

Authors:  Vladislav Pavlovich Zhitny; Noama Iftekhar; Shannon Moreno; Frank Stile
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-06-18

6.  A Systematic Review of Subsurface Radiofrequency Treatments in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  Does Liposuction Improve Body Image and Symptoms of Eating Disorders?

Authors:  Kai M M Saariniemi; Asko M Salmi; Hilkka H Peltoniemi; Pia Charpentier; Hannu O M Kuokkanen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-10

8.  Prospective clinical study of 551 cases of liposuction and abdominoplasty performed individually and in combination.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2013-09-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.