Literature DB >> 22183490

A breath test for malignant mesothelioma using an electronic nose.

Eleanor A Chapman1, Paul S Thomas, Emily Stone, Craig Lewis, Deborah H Yates.   

Abstract

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a rare tumour which is difficult to diagnose in its early stages. Earlier detection of MM could potentially improve survival. Exhaled breath sampling of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a carbon polymer array (CPA) electronic nose recognises specific breath profiles characteristic of different diseases, and can distinguish between patients with lung cancer and controls. With MM, the potential confounding effect of other asbestos-related diseases (ARDs) needs to be considered. We hypothesised that as CPA electronic nose would distinguish patients with MM, patients with benign ARDs, and controls with high sensitivity and specificity. 20 MM, 18 ARD and 42 control subjects participated in a cross-sectional, case-control study. Breath samples were analysed using the Cyranose 320 (Smiths Detection, Pasadena, CA, USA), using canonical discriminant analysis and principal component reduction. 10 MM subjects created the training set. Smell prints from 10 new MM patients were distinguished from control subjects with an accuracy of 95%. Patients with MM, ARDs and control subjects were correctly identified in 88% of cases. Exhaled breath VOC profiling can accurately distinguish between patients with MM, ARDs and controls using a CPA electronic nose. This could eventually translate into a screening tool for high-risk populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22183490     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00040911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  23 in total

Review 1.  Electronic Nose Technology in Respiratory Diseases.

Authors:  Silvano Dragonieri; Giorgio Pennazza; Pierluigi Carratu; Onofrio Resta
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  Using a chemiresistor-based alkane sensor to distinguish exhaled breaths of lung cancer patients from subjects with no lung cancer.

Authors:  Jiunn-Liang Tan; Zheng-Xin Yong; Chong-Kin Liam
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Diagnostic Performance of Electronic Noses in Cancer Diagnoses Using Exhaled Breath: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Max H M C Scheepers; Zaid Al-Difaie; Lloyd Brandts; Andrea Peeters; Bart van Grinsven; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 4.  Breath analysis as a diagnostic and screening tool for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa Brusselmans; Lieselot Arnouts; Charissa Millevert; Joyce Vandersnickt; Jan P van Meerbeeck; Kevin Lamote
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10

Review 5.  Advances in electronic-nose technologies for the detection of volatile biomarker metabolites in the human breath.

Authors:  Alphus D Wilson
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2015-03-02

Review 6.  Breath analysis as a potential and non-invasive frontier in disease diagnosis: an overview.

Authors:  Jorge Pereira; Priscilla Porto-Figueira; Carina Cavaco; Khushman Taunk; Srikanth Rapole; Rahul Dhakne; Hampapathalu Nagarajaram; José S Câmara
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2015-01-09

7.  Expiratory flow rate, breath hold and anatomic dead space influence electronic nose ability to detect lung cancer.

Authors:  Andras Bikov; Marton Hernadi; Beata Zita Korosi; Laszlo Kunos; Gabriella Zsamboki; Zoltan Sutto; Adam Domonkos Tarnoki; David Laszlo Tarnoki; Gyorgy Losonczy; Ildiko Horvath
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.317

Review 8.  Assessment, origin, and implementation of breath volatile cancer markers.

Authors:  Hossam Haick; Yoav Y Broza; Pawel Mochalski; Vera Ruzsanyi; Anton Amann
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 9.  Clinical use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in pulmonary diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kim D G van de Kant; Linda J T M van der Sande; Quirijn Jöbsis; Onno C P van Schayck; Edward Dompeling
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2012-12-21

Review 10.  Detection of cancer through exhaled breath: a systematic review.

Authors:  Agne Krilaviciute; Jonathan Alexander Heiss; Marcis Leja; Juozas Kupcinskas; Hossam Haick; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.