Literature DB >> 22182684

Surface charge density determination of single conical nanopores based on normalized ion current rectification.

Juan Liu1, Maksim Kvetny, Jingyu Feng, Dengchao Wang, Baohua Wu, Warren Brown, Gangli Wang.   

Abstract

Current rectification is well known in ion transport through nanoscale pores and channel devices. The measured current is affected by both the geometry and fixed interfacial charges of the nanodevices. In this article, an interesting trend is observed in steady-state current-potential measurements using single conical nanopores. A threshold low-conductivity state is observed upon the dilution of electrolyte concentration. Correspondingly, the normalized current at positive bias potentials drastically increases and contributes to different degrees of rectification. This novel trend at opposite bias polarities is employed to differentiate the ion flux affected by the fixed charges at the substrate-solution interface (surface effect), with respect to the constant asymmetric geometry (volume effect). The surface charge density (SCD) of individual nanopores, an important physical parameter that is challenging to measure experimentally and is known to vary from one nanopore to another, is directly quantified by solving Poisson and Nernst-Planck equations in the simulation of the experimental results. The flux distribution inside the nanopore and the SCD of individual nanopores are reported. The respective diffusion and migration translocations are found to vary at different positions inside the nanopore. This knowledge is believed to be important for resistive pulse sensing applications because the detection signal is determined by the perturbation of the ion current by the analytes.
© 2011 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22182684     DOI: 10.1021/la203106w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  14 in total

1.  Resistive-pulse measurements with nanopipettes: detection of Au nanoparticles and nanoparticle-bound anti-peanut IgY.

Authors:  Yixian Wang; Kaan Kececi; Michael V Mirkin; Vigneshwaran Mani; Naimish Sardesai; James F Rusling
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 9.825

2.  Rectification of ion current in nanopipettes by external substrates.

Authors:  Niya Sa; Wen-Jie Lan; Wenqing Shi; Lane A Baker
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  A numerical study of the selectivity of an isolated cylindrical or conical nanopore to a charged macro-ion.

Authors:  Doyel Pandey; Somnath Bhattacharyya; Sandip Ghosal
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 4.  Conductivity-based detection techniques in nanofluidic devices.

Authors:  Zachary D Harms; Daniel G Haywood; Andrew R Kneller; Stephen C Jacobson
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 5.  Resistive-pulse and rectification sensing with glass and carbon nanopipettes.

Authors:  Yixian Wang; Dengchao Wang; Michael V Mirkin
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Electrochemistry at the edge of a single graphene layer in a nanopore.

Authors:  Shouvik Banerjee; Jiwook Shim; Jose Rivera; Xiaozhong Jin; David Estrada; Vita Solovyeva; Xueqiu You; James Pak; Eric Pop; Narayana Aluru; Rashid Bashir
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  Effect of concentration gradient on ionic current rectification in polyethyleneimine modified glass nano-pipettes.

Authors:  Xiao Long Deng; Tomohide Takami; Jong Wan Son; Eun Ji Kang; Tomoji Kawai; Bae Ho Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Achieving reproducible performance of electrochemical, folding aptamer-based sensors on microelectrodes: challenges and prospects.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Samiullah Wagan; Melissa Dávila Morris; James Taylor; Ryan J White
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Rectification of Ion Current in Nanopores Depends on the Type of Monovalent Cations: Experiments and Modeling.

Authors:  Trevor Gamble; Karl Decker; Timothy S Plett; Matthew Pevarnik; Jan-Frederik Pietschmann; Ivan Vlassiouk; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Zuzanna S Siwy
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 4.126

10.  Photoresistance switching of plasmonic nanopores.

Authors:  Yi Li; Francesca Nicoli; Chang Chen; Liesbet Lagae; Guido Groeseneken; Tim Stakenborg; Henny W Zandbergen; Cees Dekker; Pol Van Dorpe; Magnus P Jonsson
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 11.189

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.