Literature DB >> 2218173

The summarizing of clinical experiments by significance levels.

F J Anscombe1.   

Abstract

For a controlled clinical experiment in which two alternative treatments are compared, the statistical report often culminates in a significance test of the null hypothesis of no difference between the treatments, and significance at the 5 per cent level is taken as positive evidence of difference. It is argued that such an experiment serves primarily an inferential purpose; it is not a simple decision procedure, although its effect on practice may be considered in relation to ethical issues. Statistical inference should not be identified with testing this null hypothesis, despite the emphasis on such tests by R. A. Fisher in his work on design of experiments. This null hypothesis often has no interest or credibility.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2218173     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780090617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  2 in total

1.  Root resorption of self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets in severe anterior crowding Class I patients: a longitudinal retrospective study.

Authors:  Weiting Chen; Abdul Azeem Aminul Haq; Yu Zhou
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Stephen J Senn; Kenneth J Rothman; John B Carlin; Charles Poole; Steven N Goodman; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 8.082

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.