Literature DB >> 22181679

Beyond shared perceptions of trust and monitoring in teams: implications of asymmetry and dissensus.

Bart A De Jong1, Kurt T Dirks.   

Abstract

Past research has implicitly assumed that only mean levels of trust and monitoring in teams are critical for explaining their interrelations and their relationships with team performance. In this article, the authors argue that it is equally important to consider the dispersion in trust and monitoring that exists within teams. The authors introduce "trust asymmetry" and "monitoring dissensus" as critical dispersion properties of trust and monitoring and hypothesize that these moderate the relationships between mean monitoring, mean trust, and team performance. Data from a cross-lagged panel study and a partially lagged study support the hypotheses. The first study also offered support for an integrative model that includes mean and dispersion levels of both trust and monitoring. Overall, the studies provide a comprehensive and clear picture of how trust and monitoring emerge and function at the team level via mean and dispersion.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22181679     DOI: 10.1037/a0026483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  2 in total

1.  Neural Responses to Truth Telling and Risk Propensity under Asymmetric Information.

Authors:  Hideo Suzuki; Masaya Misaki; Frank Krueger; Jerzy Bodurka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Trust in Group Decisions: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jason E Sapp; Dario M Torre; Kelsey L Larsen; Eric S Holmboe; Steven J Durning
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.463

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.