Literature DB >> 22180813

Genome sequence of the moderately thermophilic halophile Flexistipes sinusarabici strain (MAS10).

Alla Lapidus, Olga Chertkov, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Nancy Hammon, Shweta Deshpande, Jan-Fang Cheng, Roxanne Tapia, Cliff Han, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Ivanova, Marcel Huntemann, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Evelyne-Marie Brambilla, Manfred Rohde, Birte Abt, Stefan Spring, Markus Göker, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Tanja Woyke.   

Abstract

Flexistipes sinusarabici Fiala et al. 2000 is the type species of the genus Flexistipes in the family Deferribacteraceae. The species is of interest because of its isolated phylogenetic location in a genomically under-characterized region of the tree of life, and because of its origin from a multiply extreme environment; the Atlantis Deep brines of the Red Sea, where it had to struggle with high temperatures, high salinity, and a high concentrations of heavy metals. This is the fourth completed genome sequence to be published of a type strain of the family Deferribacteraceae. The 2,526,590 bp long genome with its 2,346 protein-coding and 53 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deferribacteraceae; GEBA; Gram-negative; brine; heterotrophic; marine; moderately thermophilic; non-motile; strictly anaerobic

Year:  2011        PMID: 22180813      PMCID: PMC3236037          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2235024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain MAS10T (= DSM 4947 = ATCC 49648) is the type strain of Flexistipes sinusarabici [1,2] which is the type and only species of the genus Flexistipes [1,2]. The strain was first isolated from the Atlantis II Deep brines of the Red Sea [1], together with four related isolates. The generic name derives from the Latin words flexus, a bending, turning, winding, and stipes, a branch of tree, stick [1]. The species epithet is derived from the Latin words sinus, a curve or fold in land, a gulf, and arabicus, Arabic, describing the place of isolation [1]. Since the time of its isolation in the late 1980s until now no closely related bacterium (16S rRNA identity >90%) was described. The resistance of the strain to moderate heat, high salt concentrations, and heavy metals [1] should make it an interesting target for extremophile biotechnology. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for F. sinusarabici MAS10T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of strain MAS10T was compared using NCBI BLAST [3,4] under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [5] and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [6]) were determined, weighted by BLAST scores. The most frequently occurring genera were Acidithiobacillus (60.0%), Deferribacter (26.8%), Flexistipes (8.2%), Desulfuromonas (2.2%) and Calditerrivibrio (1.8%) (80 hits in total). Regarding the single hit to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 98.0%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 96.9%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was Deferribacter abyssi (AJ515881), which corresponded to an identity of 89.7% and an HSP coverage of 86.4%. (Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.) The highest-scoring environmental sequence was FR744611 ('succession potential reducers nitrate-treated facility determined temperature and nitrate availability production water Halfdan oil field clone PWB039'), which showed an identity of 96.7% and an HSP coverage of 93.1%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of all environmental samples which yielded hits were 'microbi' (3.9%), 'acid' (3.4%), 'sediment' (3.3%), 'water' (3.0%) and 'oil' (2.4%) (170 hits in total). The most frequently occurring keyword within the labels of those environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species was 'avail, determin, facil, field, halfdan, nitrat, nitrate-tr, oil, potenti, product, reduc, success, temperatur, water' (7.1%) (1 hit in total). While these keywords fit to the marine environment from which strain MAS10T originated, they also point to sediments and oil fields which were so far not considered as habitats for F. sinusarabici. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of F. sinusarabici MAS10T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the two identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ by two nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence M59231, which contains 25 ambiguous base calls.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of F. sinusarabici relative to the type strains of the other species within the phylum "Deferribacteres". The tree was inferred from 1,459 aligned characters [7,8] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [9]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [10] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 250 ML bootstrap replicates [11] (left) and from 1,000 maximum parsimony bootstrap replicates [12] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [13] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [14-16].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of F. sinusarabici relative to the type strains of the other species within the phylum "Deferribacteres". The tree was inferred from 1,459 aligned characters [7,8] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [9]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [10] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 250 ML bootstrap replicates [11] (left) and from 1,000 maximum parsimony bootstrap replicates [12] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [13] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [14-16].
Table 1

Classification and general features of F. sinusarabici MAS10T according to the MIGS recommendations [17] and the NamesforLife database [18].

MIGS ID   Property   Term   Evidence code
   Current classification   Domain Bacteria   TAS [19]
   Phylum “Deferribacteres   TAS [20,21]
   Class “Deferribacteres   TAS [22,23]
   Order Deferribacterales   TAS [22,24]
   Family Deferribacteraceae   TAS [22,25]
   Genus Flexistipes   TAS [1,2]
   Species Flexistipes sinusarabici   TAS [1,2]
   Type strain MAS10   TAS [1]
   Gram stain   negative   TAS [1]
   Cell shape   straight to acutely bent rods   TAS [1]
   Motility   non-motile   TAS [1]
   Sporulation   none   TAS [1]
   Temperature range   30–53°C, moderately thermophilic   TAS [1]
   Optimum temperature   45–50°C   TAS [1]
   Salinity   at least 3% NaCl, growths with up to 18% NaCl   TAS [1]
MIGS-22   Oxygen requirement   strictly anaerobic   TAS [1]
   Carbon source   complex organic components like yeast extract,   meat extract, peptone, tryptone   TAS [1]
   Energy metabolism   heterotrophic   TAS [1]
MIGS-6   Habitat   marine, deep brine water   TAS [1]
MIGS-15   Biotic relationship   free-living   TAS [1]
MIGS-14   Pathogenicity   none   TAS [1]
   Biosafety level   1   TAS [26]
   Isolation   interface between upper brine layer and deep sea water   TAS [1]
MIGS-4   Geographic location   Atlantis II Deep brines, Red Sea   TAS [1]
MIGS-5   Sample collection time   1987 or before   NAS
MIGS-4.1   Latitude   21.37   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.2   Longitude   38.07   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.3   Depth   2,000 – 2,200 m   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.4   Altitude   -2,200 – 2,200 m   TAS [1]

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [27].

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [27]. Cells of strain MAS10T are straight to bent rods, about 0.3 μm wide and 4–50 μm long (Figure 2) [1]. F. sinusarabici was described as non-motile [1]. Spore-formation was not observed [1]. MAS10T cells stain Gram-negative, and growth is strictly anaerobic, with the best growth occurring within a temperature range of 45–50°C and a minimum doubling time of 8 ½ hours [1]. Optimal pH range for the strain is pH 6-8 [1]. Strain MAS10T requires at least 3% NaCl for growth, but also grows at salt concentrations as high as 10% [1]. The organism prefers complex growth substrates such as yeast extract, meat extract, peptone and tryptone, while formate, lactate, citrate, malate, carbohydrate, amino acids and alcohols do not support cell growth [1]. Strain MAS10T shows an unusual resistance against the transcription inhibitor rifampicin [1], which is however also commonly found among the spirochetes.
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of F. sinusarabici MAS10T

Scanning electron micrograph of F. sinusarabici MAS10T

Chemotaxonomy

The chemotaxonomic data for MAS10T is relatively sparse: No information on cell wall structure, quinones or polar lipids is available. The fatty acid composition is dominated by saturated unbranched acids: C18 (23.3%), C16 (15.1%), C17 (12.6%), with some branched acids iso-C14 (10.2%), anteiso-C15 (10.2%), iso-C16 (4.1%), iso-C15 (3.6%), and few unsaturated acids C18:1 (9.9%), C16:1 (2.8%), C17:1 (2.5%) [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [28], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [29]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome On Line Database [13] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID   Property   Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality   Finished
MIGS-28   Libraries used   Four genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library,   two 454 PE libraries (3 kb, 15.5 kb insert size), one Illumina library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms   Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2   Sequencing coverage   162.0 × Illumina; 37.9 × pyrosequence
MIGS-30   Assemblers   Newbler version 2.3, Velvet version 0.7.63, phrap SPS-4.24
MIGS-32   Gene calling method   Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
   INSDC ID   CP002858
   Genbank Date of Release   June 17, 2011
   GOLD ID   Gc01819
   NCBI project ID   45817
   Database: IMG-GEBA   2505679008
MIGS-13   Source material identifier   DSM 4947
   Project relevance   Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

F. sinusarabici MAS10T, DSM 4947, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 524 (Flexistipes Medium) [30] at 47°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using Jetflex Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GENOMED 600100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, but adding 10µl proteinase K for one hour extended lysis at 58°C. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [31].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [32]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 175 contigs in two scaffolds was converted into a phrap [33] assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (489.7 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [34] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 2.0 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 170.4 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [33] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [32], Dupfinisher [35], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F. Chang, unpublished). A total of 605 additional reactions and 15 shatter libraries were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [36]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 199.9 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 248,918 pyrosequence and 395,536,860 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [37] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [38]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [39].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 2,526,590 bp long circular chromosome with a G+C content of 38.3% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 2,399 genes predicted, 2,346 were protein-coding genes, and 53 RNAs; 85 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (75.2%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute   Value   % of Total
Genome size (bp)   2,526,590   100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)   2,179,830   86.28%
DNA G+C content (bp)   967,539   38.29%
Number of replicons   1
Extrachromosomal Elements   0
Total genes   2,399   100.00%
RNA genes   53   2.21%
rRNA operons   2
Protein-coding genes   2,346   97.79%
Pseudo genes   85   3.54%
Genes with function prediction   1,803   75.16%
Genes in paralog clusters   242   10.09%
Genes assigned to COGs   1,924   80.20%
Genes assigned Pfam domains   1,978   82.45%
Genes with signal peptides   366   15.26%
Genes with transmembrane helices   579   24.14%
CRISPR repeats   0
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code   value    %age    Description
J   145    7.0    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A   1    0.1    RNA processing and modification
K   84    4.0    Transcription
L   205    9.8    Replication, recombination and repair
B   2    0.1    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   21    1.0    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y   0    0.0    Nuclear structure
V   26    1.3    Defense mechanisms
T   115    5.5    Signal transduction mechanisms
M   135    6.5    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N   36    1.7    Cell motility
Z   0    0.0    Cytoskeleton
W   0    0.0    Extracellular structures
U   62    3.0    Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O   81    3.9    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   174    8.3    Energy production and conversion
G   66    3.2    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   198    9.5    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   52    2.5    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   115    5.5    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   60    2.9    Lipid transport and metabolism
P   86    4.1    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   32    1.5    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   246    11.8    General function prediction only
S   145    7.0    Function unknown
-   475    19.8    Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Insight into the genome sequence

Comparative genomics

Lacking an available genome sequence of Deferribacter abyssi, the species yielding the highest score, the following comparative analyses were done with D. desulfuricans [14] (GenBank AP011529, AP011530) and Calditerrivibrio nitroreducens (GenBank CP002347, CP002348) [16], the phylogenetically closest organisms for which a genome sequence was available. The genomes of F. sinusarabici, D. desulfuricans and C. nitroreducens are similar in sizes (2.5 Mb, 2.5 Mb and 2.2 Mb, respectively) and have a similar, quite low G+C content (38%, 30% and 36%, respectively). Whereas F. sinusarabici has no plasmid, D. desulfuricans harbors a 5.9 kb plasmid; C. nitroreducens contains a 30.8 kb megaplasmid. An estimate of the overall similarity between the three genomes was generated with the GGDC-Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator [40,41]. This system calculates the distances by comparing the genomes to obtain HSPs (high-scoring segment pairs) and inferring distances from a set of formulas (1, HSP length / total length; 2, identities / HSP length; 3, identities / total length). Table 5 shows the results of the pairwise comparison between the three genomes.
Table 5

Pairwise comparison of F. sinusarabici, D. desulfuricans and C. nitroreducens using the GGDC-Calculator.

  1, HSP length /  total length [%]  2, identities /  HSP length [%]  3, identities /  total length [%]
F. sinusarabiciD. desulfuricans  5.9  83.2  4.9
F. sinusarabiciC. nitroreducens  5.1  83.3  4.3
D. desulfuricansC. nitroreducens  9.9  83.3  8.3
The comparison of the F. sinusarabici and D. desulfuricans genomes revealed that 5.9% of the average of both genome lengths are covered with HSPs. The identity within these HSPs was 83.2%, whereas the identity over the whole genome was only 4.9%. Similar results were inferred for F. sinusarabici and C. nitroreducens (Table 5). The genomes of D. desulfuricans and C. nitroreducens show a significantly higher degree of similarity with 9.9% of the average of both genomes are covered with HSPs of 83.3% identity. The identity over the whole length of the genomes was 8.3%. These values corroborate the relationship between the three organisms as shown in the 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree in Figure 1, as there is no bootstrap support that F. sinusarabici is closer related to either C. nitroreducens or D. desulfuricans. The fraction of shared genes in the three genomes is shown in a Venn diagram (Figure 4). The numbers of pairwise shared genes were calculated with the phylogenetic profiler function of the IMG/ER platform [33]. The homologous genes within the genomes were detected with a maximum E-value of 10-5 and a minimum identity of 30%. Roughly 61% of all genes in the genomes (1,400 genes) are shared by all three genomes, with about equal numbers of genes (224 and 246) shared on a pairwise basis by F. sinusarabici and D. desulfuricans or by D. desulfuricans and C. nitroreducens, respectively, and to the exclusion of the third genome. Within the 567 unique genes of F. sinusarabici that have no detectable homologs in the genomes of D. desulfuricans and C. nitroreducens (under the sequence similarity thresholds used for the comparison) the 86 genes (3.7% based on the whole gene number) encoding transposases appear to be noteworthy.
Figure 4

Venn diagram depicting the intersections of protein sets (total number of derived protein sequences in parentheses) of F. sinusarabici, D. desulfuricans and C. nitroreducens.

Venn diagram depicting the intersections of protein sets (total number of derived protein sequences in parentheses) of F. sinusarabici, D. desulfuricans and C. nitroreducens. A remarkable difference between the compared organisms is their motility. Whereas F. sinusarabici is described to be non-motile, D. desulfuricans is motile by twitching [14] and C. nitroreducens is also described to be motile [16]. The mechanism of twitching motility is still unknown but it is thought that moving across surfaces is caused by extension and retraction of type IV pili. A set of genes that is responsible for twitching motility was identified in several organisms; in Pseudomonas aeruginosa a gene cluster involved in pilus biosynthesis and twitching motility was characterized, the gene products of this gene cluster show a high degree of sequence similarity to the chemotaxis (che) proteins of enterics and the gliding bacterium Myxococcus xanthus [42]. A closer look into the genome sequences of F. sinusarabici, D. desulfuricans and C. nitroreducens revealed the presence of different gene sets coding for chemotaxis proteins. In contrast to D. desulfuricans and C. nitroreducens, F. sinusarabici lacks four che genes (cheB, cheR, cheV, cheW). In P. aeruginosa a mutation in the pilI gene, a homolog to cheW, lead to a blocking of pilus production [42]. It can be assumed that the missing cheW gene in F. sinusarabici might be responsible for the non-motility of the cells, despite the rather large number of 36 genes annotated in the cell motility category of table 4.
  25 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs.

Authors:  Alexander F Auch; Hans-Peter Klenk; Markus Göker
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-01-28

10.  Complete genome sequence of Calditerrivibrio nitroreducens type strain (Yu37-1).

Authors:  Sam Pitluck; Johannes Sikorski; Ahmet Zeytun; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxane Tapia; Cliff Han; Lynne Goodwin; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; John C Detter; Evelyne Brambilla; Oliver Duplex Ngatchou Djao; Manfred Rohde; Stefan Spring; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Miriam Land
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-02-20
View more
  5 in total

1.  Acid-shifted isoelectric point profiles of the proteins in a hypersaline microbial mat: an adaptation to life at high salt concentrations?

Authors:  Rahel Elevi Bardavid; Aharon Oren
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Life at high salt concentrations, intracellular KCl concentrations, and acidic proteomes.

Authors:  Aharon Oren
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  The Microbial Community and Functional Potential in the Midland Basin Reveal a Community Dominated by Both Thiosulfate and Sulfate-Reducing Microorganisms.

Authors:  Kara Tinker; Daniel Lipus; James Gardiner; Mengling Stuckman; Djuna Gulliver
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-06-13

4.  Microbial diversity in long-term water-flooded oil reservoirs with different in situ temperatures in China.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Yue-Hui She; Lu-Jun Chai; Ibrahim M Banat; Xiao-Tao Zhang; Fu-Chang Shu; Zheng-Liang Wang; Long-Jiang Yu; Du-Jie Hou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Identification of Persistent Sulfidogenic Bacteria in Shale Gas Produced Waters.

Authors:  Lisa Cliffe; Sophie L Nixon; Rebecca A Daly; Bob Eden; Kevin G Taylor; Christopher Boothman; Michael J Wilkins; Kelly C Wrighton; Jonathan R Lloyd
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.