Literature DB >> 22180811

Genome sequence of Haemophilus parasuis strain 29755.

Michael A Mullins, Karen B Register, Darrell O Bayles, David W Dyer, Joanna S Kuehn, Gregory J Phillips.   

Abstract

Haemophilus parasuis is a member of the family Pasteurellaceae and is the etiologic agent of Glässer's disease in pigs, a systemic syndrome associated with only a subset of isolates. The genetic basis for virulence and systemic spread of particular H. parasuis isolates is currently unknown. Strain 29755 is an invasive isolate that has long been used in the study of Glässer's disease. Accordingly, the genome sequence of strain 29755 is of considerable importance to investigators endeavoring to understand the molecular pathogenesis of H. parasuis. Here we describe the features of the 2,224,137 bp draft genome sequence of strain 29755 generated from 454-FLX pyrosequencing. These data comprise the first publicly available genome sequence for this bacterium.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glässer’s disease; Haemophilus parasuis; swine

Year:  2011        PMID: 22180811      PMCID: PMC3236040          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2245029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

H. parasuis is an obligate pathogen of swine [1]. The bacterium is often carried in the nasal passages [2], but not the lungs [3], of healthy pigs. Through unknown mechanisms some strains can spread systemically and may be isolated from the meninges, lungs, serosa, joints, and blood. H. parasuis strain 29755 (IA84-29755), though not the type strain, has been used extensively in a variety of investigations [4-8] and is the most fully characterized strain of the species. Originally cultured at Iowa State University from a pig exhibiting Glässer’s disease, 29755 is a serovar 5 isolate [9], a class recognized as highly virulent and frequently isolated from respiratory and systemic sites [9,10]. Of the 15 recognized serovars, serovar 5 strains are isolated more frequently worldwide than any other [11]. Strain 29755 has been used as a component of at least one commercially available H. parasuis vaccine (Suvaxyn M. hyo – parasuis, Fort Dodge Animal Health).

Classification and features

The genus Haemophilus belongs to the Gammaproteobacteria and is classified in the family Pasteurellaceae [12] (Table 1). A phylogenetic tree based on 16S ribosomal RNA sequences is depicted in Figure 1 for H. parasuis and related organisms.
Table 1

MIGS classification and general features of H. parasuis strain 29755.

MIGS ID   Property   Term  Evidence code
   Current classification   Domain Bacteria  TAS [13]
   Phylum Proteobacteria  TAS [14]
   Class Gammaproteobacteria  TAS [15,16]
   Order Pasteurellales  TAS [15,17]
   Family Pasteurellaceae  TAS [18,19]
   Genus Haemophilus  TAS [20-22]
   Species Haemophilus parasuis  TAS [20,23]
   Strain 29755
   Serotype 5
   Gram stain   negative  TAS [1]
   Cell shape   rods (pleomorphic)  TAS [1]
   Motility   nonmotile  TAS [1]
   Sporulation   non-sporulating  TAS [1]
   Temperature range   mesophile (20°C-37°C)  TAS [12]
   Optimum temperature   35°C-37°C  TAS [12]
   Carbon source   saccharolytic  TAS [24]
   Energy source   chemoorganotroph  TAS [24]
   Terminal electron receptor   Oxygen  TAS [25]
MIGS-6   Habitat   Host, swine upper respiratory tract  TAS [1]
MIGS-6.3   Salinity   1-1.5%  TAS [12]
MIGS-22   Oxygen requirement   facultative  TAS [12]
MIGS-15   Biotic relationship   obligate pathogen of swine  TAS [1]
MIGS-14   Pathogenicity   mild to severe  TAS [1]
MIGS-4   Geographic location   Iowa  NAS
MIGS-5   Sample collection time   1970s  NAS
MIGS-4.1    Latitude    not reported
MIGS-4.2   Longitude   not reported
MIGS-4.3   Depth   not reported
MIGS-4.4   Altitude   not reported

Evidence codes - NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [26]

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA of H. parasuis 29755 and type strains of some closely related species and other genera within the Pasteurellaceae. Also included is the only additional H. parasuis strain for which a genome sequence has been reported, SH0165. The tree was generated with the tree-builder available from the Ribosomal Database Project[27] using the Weighbor (weighted neighbor-joining) algorithm [28] with Jukes-Cantor distance correction [29]. Numbers to the left of branches indicate the percentage of trees in which each branch was represented in 100 replicates. An E. coli type strain was used as an outgroup.

Evidence codes - NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [26] Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA of H. parasuis 29755 and type strains of some closely related species and other genera within the Pasteurellaceae. Also included is the only additional H. parasuis strain for which a genome sequence has been reported, SH0165. The tree was generated with the tree-builder available from the Ribosomal Database Project[27] using the Weighbor (weighted neighbor-joining) algorithm [28] with Jukes-Cantor distance correction [29]. Numbers to the left of branches indicate the percentage of trees in which each branch was represented in 100 replicates. An E. coli type strain was used as an outgroup. H. parasuis is a small, non-motile, rod-shaped bacterium [1] (Figure 2). The presence of a capsule is variable and may affect colony and cellular morphology [30]. Growth of the bacterium in vitro is dependent on the coenzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD, or V factor) [31] but, in contrast to some other members of the genus, does not require porphyrins like hemin (X factor) [32]. Plating on Casman Agar Base (BBL) supplemented with 1% (w/v) NAD (Sigma) and 5% GIBCO filtered horse serum (Invitrogen) or on chocolate agar produces small, translucent colonies that appear within 24 hours and reach full size in approximately two days. Colonies are nonhemolytic when grown on blood agar [1]. H. parasuis grows under normal atmosphere at 37°C, although added humidity and 5% CO2 may improve growth.
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of H. parasuis 29755

Scanning electron micrograph of H. parasuis 29755

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

H. parasuis strain 29755 was selected for sequencing because it has long been used in the study of Glässer’s disease. Pyrosequencing (454 Life Sciences) was performed at the State University of New York, University at Buffalo Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences. The draft genome sequence is deposited in GenBank (NZ_ABKM00000000). Summary project information is shown in Table 2 according to the Minimum Information about a Genomic Sequence (MIGS) recommendations [34] and the genome content is summarized in Table 3.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID   Property   Term
MIGS-28   Libraries used   one 454 pyrosequence standard library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms   454 (FLX)
MIGS-30   Assemblers   Newbler
MIGS-31   Finishing quality   draft
MIGS-31.2   Fold coverage   28×
MIGS-32   Gene calling method   Glimmer, GeneMark [33]
   Genome Database release   February 14, 2008
   Genbank ID   NZ_ABKM00000000
   Genbank Date of Release   February 14, 2008
   GOLD ID   -
   Project relevance   food animal pathogenesis
Table 3

Genome statistics

Attribute   Value   % of totala
Size (bp)   2,224,137   100.0%
G+C content (bp)   867,413   39.0%
Coding region (bp)   1,890,516   85.0%
Total genes   2,309   100.0%
RNA genes   58   2.5%
Protein-coding genes   2,244   97.2%
Pseudogenes   noneb   0.0%
Genes in paralog clusters   ndc   -
Genes assigned to COGs   1,926   83.4%
PSORT cytoplasmic   1,181   50.4%
PSORT extracellular   5   0.2%
PSORT outer membrane   51   2.2%
PSORT periplasmic   52   2.2%
PSORT unknown   1,055   45.0%

a Based either on the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

b Based on preliminary analysis the of draft genome

c nd = not determined

a Based either on the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome b Based on preliminary analysis the of draft genome c nd = not determined

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

H. parasuis 29755 was grown from a frozen seed stock for two days under 5% CO2 at 37°C on Casman Agar Base (BBL) supplemented with 1% (w/v) NAD (Sigma) and 5% GIBCO filtered horse serum (Invitrogen). Following growth, a single colony was used to inoculate 5 ml of brain-heart infusion medium supplemented with 10 μg/ml NAD and 10 μg/ml hemin (sBHI) and the culture was incubated overnight at 37°C and 185 rpm. The next day, 2 ml of the culture were added to 100 ml of sBHI and the bacterium was again allowed to grow overnight to stationary phase at 37°C and 185 rpm. Bacterial cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 4000 × g for 10 minutes. The pellet was resuspended and used as the source of genomic DNA purified with the QIAGEN Blood & Cell Culture DNA Kit, as recommended by the manufacturer. The final preparation contained 1.12 μg/ul genomic DNA as determined by UV absorption spectrometry.

Genome sequencing and assembly

Library preparation yielded 9.65 × 108 molecules/μl of DNA with a mean size of approximately 600 nucleotides, as determined with a RNA6000 Pico chip on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Emulsion PCR was performed at a concentration of 2 molecules per bead. Following sequencing, contigs were assembled using the 454 Newbler assembler.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified manually using GeneMark and automatically using Glimmer as part of the NCBI draft genome submission pipeline. Translated protein sequences were analyzed using PSORTb v.2.0 [35] to predict final location within the cell and assigned to COG functional categories (Table 4).
Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code  Value  %agea   Description
J  168  6.55   Translation
A  1  0.03   RNA processing and modification
K  127  4.96   Transcription
L  166  6.48   Replication, recombination and repair
B  0  0.00   Chromatin structure and dynamics
D  33  1.29   Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y  0  0.00   Nuclear structure
V  32  1.25   Defense mechanisms
T  48  1.87   Signal transduction mechanisms
M  134  5.23   Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N  16  0.62   Cell motility
Z  0  0.00   Cytoskeleton
W  24  0.94   Extracellular structures
U  75  2.93   Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O  101  3.94   Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C  115  4.49   Energy production and conversion
G  139  5.42   Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E  175  6.83   Amino acid transport and metabolism
F  57  2.22   Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H  97  3.78   Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I  43  1.68   Lipid transport and metabolism
P  116  4.53   Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q  25  0.96   Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R  234  9.13   General function prediction only
S  197  7.69   Function unknown
-  440  17.16   Not in COGs

a Based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

a Based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Genome properties

The draft genome is 2,224,137 bp and is likely comprised of one circular chromosome with a G+C content of approximately 39% (Figure 3). For display, contigs were assembled end-to-end with twenty “N” bases between contigs. Orientation and order of contigs will change when the genome sequence is closed.
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the H. parasuis 29755 draft pseudogenome. From the outside to the center: open reading frames (ORFs) on the forward strand (one ring for each reading frame), start and stop codons for forward and reverse strands, ORFs on the reverse strand, GC content, and GC skew. The map was generated using CGView Server [36,37].

Graphical circular map of the H. parasuis 29755 draft pseudogenome. From the outside to the center: open reading frames (ORFs) on the forward strand (one ring for each reading frame), start and stop codons for forward and reverse strands, ORFs on the reverse strand, GC content, and GC skew. The map was generated using CGView Server [36,37].
  24 in total

1.  Weighted neighbor joining: a likelihood-based approach to distance-based phylogeny reconstruction.

Authors:  W J Bruno; N D Socci; A L Halpern
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  ACTION OF HAEMOPHILUS CULTURES ON DELTA-AMINOLEVULINIC ACID.

Authors:  E L BIBERSTEIN; P D MINI; M G GILLS
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Theoretical foundation to estimate the relative efficiencies of the Jukes-Cantor+gamma model and the Jukes-Cantor model in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.

Authors:  Anup Som
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  The Families and Genera of the Bacteria: Preliminary Report of the Committee of the Society of American Bacteriologists on Characterization and Classification of Bacterial Types.

Authors:  C E Winslow; J Broadhurst; R E Buchanan; C Krumwiede; L A Rogers; G H Smith
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1917-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Serological characterisation of Haemophilus parasuis isolates from Australian pigs.

Authors:  P J Blackall; V J Rapp-Gabrielson; D J Hampson
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.281

6.  Immunohistochemical detection of Haemophilus parasuis serovar 5 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues of experimentally infected swine.

Authors:  J Segalés; M Domingo; G I Solano; C Pijoan
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.279

7.  Prevalence of Haemophilus parasuis serovars among isolates from swine.

Authors:  V J Rapp-Gabrielson; D A Gabrielson
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Naturally-farrowed, artificially-reared pigs as an alternative model for experimental infection by Haemophilus parasuis.

Authors:  Simone Oliveira; Lucina Galina; Isabel Blanco; Ana Canals; Carlos Pijoan
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 9.  Haemophilus parasuis: new trends on diagnosis, epidemiology and control.

Authors:  Simone Oliveira; Carlos Pijoan
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv) interaction with Haemophilus parasuis.

Authors:  G I Solano; J Segalés; J E Collins; T W Molitor; C Pijoan
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  11 in total

1.  Fifteen novel immunoreactive proteins of Chinese virulent Haemophilus parasuis serotype 5 verified by an immunoproteomic assay.

Authors:  Yanfei Yu; Guangyan Wu; Zhipeng Zhai; Huochun Yao; Chengping Lu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Development of a Multiplex PCR Assay for Rapid Molecular Serotyping of Haemophilus parasuis.

Authors:  Kate J Howell; Sarah E Peters; Jinhong Wang; Juan Hernandez-Garcia; Lucy A Weinert; Shi-Lu Luan; Roy R Chaudhuri; Øystein Angen; Virginia Aragon; Susanna M Williamson; Julian Parkhill; Paul R Langford; Andrew N Rycroft; Brendan W Wren; Duncan J Maskell; Alexander W Tucker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  The use of genome wide association methods to investigate pathogenicity, population structure and serovar in Haemophilus parasuis.

Authors:  Kate J Howell; Lucy A Weinert; Roy R Chaudhuri; Shi-Lu Luan; Sarah E Peters; Jukka Corander; David Harris; Øystein Angen; Virginia Aragon; Albert Bensaid; Susanna M Williamson; Julian Parkhill; Paul R Langford; Andrew N Rycroft; Brendan W Wren; Matthew T G Holden; Alexander W Tucker; Duncan J Maskell
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Establishment of a Successive Markerless Mutation System in Haemophilus parasuis through Natural Transformation.

Authors:  Luhua Zhang; Ying Li; Ke Dai; Xintian Wen; Rui Wu; Xiaobo Huang; Jin Jin; Kui Xu; Qigui Yan; Yong Huang; Xiaoping Ma; Yiping Wen; Sanjie Cao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Draft Genome Sequences for 10 Isolates of the Swine Pathogen Haemophilus parasuis.

Authors:  Joanna S Kuehn; Karen B Register; Gregory J Phillips
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2013-09-19

6.  Complete genome analysis of a Haemophilus parasuis serovar 12 strain from China.

Authors:  Yufeng Li; Amy H Y Kwok; Jingwei Jiang; Yao Zou; Fangyuan Zheng; Pan Chen; Chengcai Hou; Frederick C Leung; Ping Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Virulence and draft genome sequence overview of multiple strains of the swine pathogen Haemophilus parasuis.

Authors:  Susan L Brockmeier; Karen B Register; Joanna S Kuehn; Tracy L Nicholson; Crystal L Loving; Darrell O Bayles; Sarah M Shore; Gregory J Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Pipeline for amplifying and analyzing amplicons of the V1-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene.

Authors:  Heather K Allen; Darrell O Bayles; Torey Looft; Julian Trachsel; Benjamin E Bass; David P Alt; Shawn M D Bearson; Tracy Nicholson; Thomas A Casey
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-08-02

9.  Gene content and diversity of the loci encoding biosynthesis of capsular polysaccharides of the 15 serovar reference strains of Haemophilus parasuis.

Authors:  Kate J Howell; Lucy A Weinert; Shi-Lu Luan; Sarah E Peters; Roy R Chaudhuri; David Harris; Oystein Angen; Virginia Aragon; Julian Parkhill; Paul R Langford; Andrew N Rycroft; Brendan W Wren; Alexander W Tucker; Duncan J Maskell
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Biofilm formation by virulent and non-virulent strains of Haemophilus parasuis.

Authors:  Bernardo Bello-Ortí; Vincent Deslandes; Yannick D N Tremblay; Josée Labrie; Kate J Howell; Alexander W Tucker; Duncan J Maskell; Virginia Aragon; Mario Jacques
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.