INTRODUCTION: Firefighters currently have substantially lower smoking rates than similar occupational groups and the general U.S. population. In contrast, firefighters have very high rates of smokeless tobacco (SLT). The reasons for this paradox have not been explored; thus, the current study examined firefighters' perspectives on tobacco use. METHODS: Key informant interviews and focus groups were conducted in a national, cross-sectional purposively sampled group of 332 career firefighters. RESULTS: Firefighters suggested several reasons for the decline in smoking in the fire service including changes in the fire service culture, concerns about the impact of smoking on their ability to perform their job, regulations aimed at reducing smoking in departments, and the costs of smoking. In contrast, they felt that the greater use of SLT was primarily due to increasing restrictions on smoking. CONCLUSIONS: The primary reasons cited for decreased smoking rates by firefighters in our study were policy implementation at the state and local levels that prohibit tobacco use as a condition of employment and related presumption laws. However, reasons beyond policy mandates such as witnessing the end results of tobacco use, fitness, greater education about the negative health effects of smoking, and awareness about increased risk of exposure to toxic products of combustions also were noted. The primary reason cited for increased SLT use was the greater restrictions on smoking.
INTRODUCTION: Firefighters currently have substantially lower smoking rates than similar occupational groups and the general U.S. population. In contrast, firefighters have very high rates of smokeless tobacco (SLT). The reasons for this paradox have not been explored; thus, the current study examined firefighters' perspectives on tobacco use. METHODS: Key informant interviews and focus groups were conducted in a national, cross-sectional purposively sampled group of 332 career firefighters. RESULTS: Firefighters suggested several reasons for the decline in smoking in the fire service including changes in the fire service culture, concerns about the impact of smoking on their ability to perform their job, regulations aimed at reducing smoking in departments, and the costs of smoking. In contrast, they felt that the greater use of SLT was primarily due to increasing restrictions on smoking. CONCLUSIONS: The primary reasons cited for decreased smoking rates by firefighters in our study were policy implementation at the state and local levels that prohibit tobacco use as a condition of employment and related presumption laws. However, reasons beyond policy mandates such as witnessing the end results of tobacco use, fitness, greater education about the negative health effects of smoking, and awareness about increased risk of exposure to toxic products of combustions also were noted. The primary reason cited for increased SLT use was the greater restrictions on smoking.
Authors: David J Lee; William LeBlanc; Lora E Fleming; Orlando Gómez-Marín; Terry Pitman Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Jesse R Geibe; Jonathan Holder; Lynne Peeples; Aaron M Kinney; John W Burress; Stefanos N Kales Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-12-21 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: C Keith Haddock; Kevin Hoffman; Jennifer E Taylor; Lisa Schwab; Walker S C Poston; Harry A Lando Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Stefanos N Kales; Elpidoforos S Soteriades; Costas A Christophi; David C Christiani Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-03-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C Keith Haddock; Nattinee Jitnarin; Walker S C Poston; Brianne Tuley; Sara A Jahnke Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Antonios J Tsismenakis; Costas A Christophi; John W Burress; Aaron M Kinney; Min Kim; Stefanos N Kales Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Nattinee Jitnarin; Walker S C Poston; Sara A Jahnke; Christopher K Haddock; Hannah N Kelley; Herbert H Severson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nattinee Jitnarin; Walker S C Poston; Christopher K Haddock; Sara A Jahnke; Rena S Day Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Robert D Daniels; Travis L Kubale; James H Yiin; Matthew M Dahm; Thomas R Hales; Dalsu Baris; Shelia H Zahm; James J Beaumont; Kathleen M Waters; Lynne E Pinkerton Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Walker S C Poston; Christopher K Haddock; Sara A Jahnke; Nattinee Jitnarin; R Sue Day Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 3.295