Literature DB >> 22180468

Meningitis or epidural abscesses after neuraxial block for removal of infected hip or knee prostheses.

K Gritsenko1, D Marcello, G A Liguori, K Jules-Elysée, S G Memtsoudis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infection, whether localized or systemic, can be a relative contraindication to neuraxial anaesthesia. Data correlating neuraxial anaesthesia and the development of meningitis or epidural abscess in this setting are limited.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on 710 medical records of patients admitted between 1998 and 2009 for removal of potentially infected total hip and total knee prostheses. Ultimately, 474 patients were identified as being infected. Factors that predisposed a patient to an immunocompromised state, and signs and symptoms of infection in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative stages were documented. Bacteraemic patients were reviewed for signs of neuraxial infection. The endpoint of follow-up was development of complications before hospital discharge.
RESULTS: All 474 patients had removal of the infected prosthesis under neuraxial anaesthesia. Mean patient age was 65.5 yr (58% >65 yr) and mean length of hospital stay was 21 days. Patient characteristics included concurrent disease (65%), steroid use (5.3%), preoperative antibiotic use (50.8%), signs of inflammatory process (84%), bacteraemia (4.2%), and documented positive intraoperative joint cultures (88%). Using clinical standards for diagnosis of central neuraxial infection, patients developed infectious complications (incidence of 0.6% on 95% confidence interval), although three patients had findings attributable to anaesthesia, including epidural haematoma, psoas abscess, and back pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on clinical criteria, our findings suggest that the incidence of central nervous system infection after neuraxial anaesthesia in patients with infected hip and knee prostheses is low after neuraxial block.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22180468     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  5 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative outcomes and type of anesthesia in hip surgical patients: An evidence based review.

Authors:  Mathias Opperer; Thomas Danninger; Ottokar Stundner; Stavros G Memtsoudis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

2.  Is neuraxial anesthesia safe in patients undergoing surgery for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection?

Authors:  Mohammad R Rasouli; Priscilla K Cavanaugh; Camilo Restrepo; Hasan Huseyin Ceylan; Hasan Huseyin Celyan; Mitchell G Maltenfort; Eugene R Viscusi; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Neuraxial Regional Anaesthesia in Patients with Active Infection and Sepsis: A Clinical Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ana María Gimeno; Carlos Luis Errando
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 4.  [Regional anesthesia in patients with pre-existing infections or immunosuppression].

Authors:  F List; P Kessler; T Volk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [SBA 2020: Regional anesthesia safety recommendations update].

Authors:  Liana Maria Tôrres de Araújo Azi; Neuber Martins Fonseca; Livia Gurgel Linard
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-05-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.