Literature DB >> 22180191

Predicted probability of meniscus tears: comparing history and physical examination with MRI.

R Yan1, H Wang, Z Yang, Z H Ji, Y M Guo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The indication for surgical treatment of a meniscal lesion should not only rely on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, but also on a detailed history and a thorough clinical examination. However, various intra-articular lesions may often produce similar symptoms. So, what kinds of symptoms are more associated with a meniscal tear? Is MRI worth doing?
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to identify sensitive and specific clinical tests and elements of patients' history with a high predictive value, and to assess the combined diagnostic accuracy of sensitive and specific clinical tests and elements of patients' history with MRI.
METHODS: Data from 281 consecutive knee arthroscopies to investigate and treat suspected internal knee pathologies were retrospectively collected between March 2009 and April 2010. The study group consisted of 262 knees. Statistically significant factors in the clinical diagnosis of meniscal tears were screened by a chi-square test. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which factors associated with meniscal tears found during arthroscopy. The diagnostic values of MRI and the sensitive and specific clinical tests and elements of patients' history with high predictive value for meniscal tears were calculated.
RESULTS: The overall diagnostic value of MRI for meniscal tears was: accuracy, 88.8%; sensitivity, 95.7%; specificity, 75.8%; positive predictive value (PPV), 88.2%; and negative predictive value (NPV), 90.4%. Giving way, locking and McMurray's test were independent diagnostic factors with a predicted correct percentage of 80.0% (p <0.05) for the diagnosis of meniscal tears found during arthroscopy. Locking, McMurray's test and MRI increased the predicted correct percentage of meniscal tears found during arthroscopy to 91.6% (p <0.05). For the diagnosis of meniscal tears found during arthroscopy, giving way, locking and McMurray's test had the following values for accuracy (49.2, 60.9, 76), sensitivity (43.5, 55.2, 75.8), specificity (84, 96, 76.9), PPV (94.4, 98.8, 95.1) and NPV (19.4, 25.8, 35.1). Combining MRI, the diagnostic values of giving way, locking, and McMurray's test were: accuracy, 88.3,89.9,89.4; sensitivity, 95.7,97.4,97.4; specificity, 74.2,75.8,74.2; PPV, 87.5,88.4,87.7; and NPV, 90.2,94,93.9.
CONCLUSIONS: Giving way, locking and McMurray's test are independent clinical diagnostic factors for the diagnosis of meniscal tears. MRI has higher accuracy, sensitivity and NPV for the diagnosis of meniscal tears than giving way, locking and McMurray's test. The combination of giving way, locking, McMurray's test and MRI for confirmation is typical for a meniscal lesion diagnosis. Based on these findings, MRI should be used in a standard manner to detect meniscal tears found during arthroscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22180191     DOI: 10.4414/smw.2011.13314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly        ISSN: 0036-7672            Impact factor:   2.193


  12 in total

1.  Characteristic arthroscopic signs of cartilage injuries indicating concomitant occult medial meniscal peripheral tears of posterior horn.

Authors:  Xintao Zhang; Tian You; Xiaocheng Jiang; Honglei Zhang; Wentao Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of meniscus posterior root pathology.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Charles P Ho; Evan James; Bernardo Crespo; Christopher M LaPrade; Lauren M Matheny
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO THE TREATMENT OF MENISCAL PATHOLOGIES: A CASE SERIES ANALYSIS OF THE MULLIGAN CONCEPT "SQUEEZE" TECHNIQUE.

Authors:  Robinetta Hudson; Amy Richmond; Belinda Sanchez; Valerie Stevenson; Russell T Baker; James May; Alan Nasypany; Don Reordan
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-08

4.  Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopy.

Authors:  Leonardo Côrtes Antunes; José Marcio Gonçalves de Souza; Nelson Baisi Cerqueira; Cleiton Dahmer; Breno Almeida de Pinho Tavares; Ângelo José Nacif de Faria
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-08-30

5.  McMurray's Test and Joint Line Tenderness for Medial Meniscus Tear: Are They Accurate?

Authors:  Yogendra Gupta; Deepak Mahara; Arjun Lamichhane
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2016-11

6.  Patient-reported symptoms and changes up to 1 year after meniscal surgery.

Authors:  Søren T Skou; Kenneth Pihl; Nis Nissen; Uffe Jørgensen; Jonas Bloch Thorlund
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Comparison of Accuracy in Expert Clinical Examination versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopic Exam in Diagnosis of Meniscal Tear.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Hashemi; Mohammad Reza Ranjbar; Mohammad Tahami; Reza Shahriarirad; Amirhossein Erfani
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2020-05-08

8.  KneeTex: an ontology-driven system for information extraction from MRI reports.

Authors:  Irena Spasić; Bo Zhao; Christopher B Jones; Kate Button
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2015-09-07

9.  Diagnostic needle arthroscopy and the economics of improved diagnostic accuracy: a cost analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Voigt; Michael Mosier; Bryan Huber
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.561

10.  Diagnosis of knee injuries: comparison of the physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging with the findings from arthroscopy.

Authors:  Nilton Orlando Júnior; Marcos George de Souza Leão; Nelson Henrique Carvalho de Oliveira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.