BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BMs) are a common occurrence in patients with breast cancer, and accurately predicting survival in these patients is critical to appropriate management. A survival nomogram for breast cancer patients with BM was constructed, and its performance is compared to current predictive models of survival. METHODS: A Cox proportional hazards regression with a nomogram representation was used to model survival in a population of 261 women with breast cancer and BMs treated from 1999 to 2008. The model was validated internally by 10-fold cross-validation and bootstrapping, and concordance (c) indices were calculated. The predictive performance of the nomogram described here is compared to current prognostic models, including recursive partitioning analysis, graded prognostic assessment, and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment. RESULTS: The c-index for the model described here was 0.67. It outperformed recursive partitioning analysis, graded prognostic assessment, and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment, based on c-index comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram described here outperformed current strategies for survival prediction in breast cancer patients with BMs. Two additional advantages of this nomogram are its ability to predict individualized, 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival for novel patients and its straightforward representations of the relative effects of each of 9 covariates on neurologic survival. This represents a potentially valuable alternative to current models of survival prediction in this patient population.
BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BMs) are a common occurrence in patients with breast cancer, and accurately predicting survival in these patients is critical to appropriate management. A survival nomogram for breast cancerpatients with BM was constructed, and its performance is compared to current predictive models of survival. METHODS: A Cox proportional hazards regression with a nomogram representation was used to model survival in a population of 261 women with breast cancer and BMs treated from 1999 to 2008. The model was validated internally by 10-fold cross-validation and bootstrapping, and concordance (c) indices were calculated. The predictive performance of the nomogram described here is compared to current prognostic models, including recursive partitioning analysis, graded prognostic assessment, and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment. RESULTS: The c-index for the model described here was 0.67. It outperformed recursive partitioning analysis, graded prognostic assessment, and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment, based on c-index comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram described here outperformed current strategies for survival prediction in breast cancerpatients with BMs. Two additional advantages of this nomogram are its ability to predict individualized, 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival for novel patients and its straightforward representations of the relative effects of each of 9 covariates on neurologic survival. This represents a potentially valuable alternative to current models of survival prediction in this patient population.
Authors: Philippe Lambin; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Maud H W Starmans; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Georgi Nalbantov; Hugo J W L Aerts; Erik Roelofs; Wouter van Elmpt; Paul C Boutros; Pierluigi Granone; Vincenzo Valentini; Adrian C Begg; Dirk De Ruysscher; Andre Dekker Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: J M H Timmers; A L M Verbeek; J IntHout; R M Pijnappel; M J M Broeders; G J den Heeten Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Timothy Malouff; Nathan R Bennion; Vivek Verma; Gabriel A Martinez; Nathan Balkman; Abhijeet Bhirud; Tanner Smith; Chi Lin Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Etsuro Bando; Xinge Ji; Michael W Kattan; Ho Seok Seo; Kyo Young Song; Cho-Hyun Park; Maria Bencivenga; Giovanni de Manzoni; Masanori Terashima Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Hui Miao; Mikael Hartman; Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy; Soo-Chin Lee; Nur Aishah Taib; Ern-Yu Tan; Patrick Chan; Karel G M Moons; Hoong-Seam Wong; Jeremy Goh; Siti Mastura Rahim; Cheng-Har Yip; Helena M Verkooijen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 3.240