Literature DB >> 22180017

The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast carcinoma.

Emad A Rakha1, Stewart Martin, Andrew H S Lee, David Morgan, Paul D P Pharoah, Zsolt Hodi, Douglas Macmillan, Ian O Ellis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although lymphovascular invasion (LVI) has been associated with a poor outcome in patients with breast cancer, it is not included in most internationally recognized staging systems, including the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) classification. This is mainly because it remains unclear whether the presence of LVI is an independent, high-risk criterion in clinically relevant staging subgroups.
METHODS: The current study was based on a large and well characterized consecutive series of patients who had operable (pathologic T1 [pT1]-pT2, pathologic N0 [pN0]-pN3, M0) breast cancer (3812 informative cases) who were treated according to standard protocols at a single institution and who had long-term follow-up to assess the prognostic value of definite LVI in clinically and molecularly relevant staging subgroups.
RESULTS: LVI was strongly associated with both breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in the entire series and in different subgroups. Multivariate analyses identified LVI as an independent predictor of both BCSS and DMFS in patients with operable breast cancer overall; in the TNM clinical subgroups pT1a-pT1c/pN0 and pT2/pN0; and in the molecular classes estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, ER-negative, human epidermal growth factor 2 [HER2]-negative, and triple-negative. In patients who had lymph node-negative tumors, LVI could be used as a high-risk criterion providing survival disadvantage equivalent to that provided by 1 or 2 involved lymph nodes (pN0 to pN1) and to that provided by 1 size category (pT1 to pT2). The use of immunohistochemistry for detecting an endothelial-specific marker contributed to the prognostic significance of LVI when applied to routine LVI negative/possible cases.
CONCLUSIONS: LVI provided a strong predictor of outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer and should be incorporated into breast cancer staging systems.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22180017     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  68 in total

1.  Prognostic Utility of Cyclin D1 in Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tamanna Parvin; Chhanda Das; Manoj Choudhury; Bitan Kumar Chattopadhyay; Madhumita Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  Axl receptor tyrosine kinase expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Timothy M D'Alfonso; Jeffrey Hannah; Zhengming Chen; Yifang Liu; Pengbo Zhou; Sandra J Shin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Industry is not the dark side, but an essential partner to make progress in reproductive health.

Authors:  Thomas D'Hooghe
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-03

4.  Profiling differential microRNA expression between in situ, infiltrative and lympho-vascular space invasive breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Patsy S Soon; Pamela J Provan; Edward Kim; Nirmala Pathmanathan; Dinny Graham; Christine L Clarke; Rosemary L Balleine
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  Tumor stiffness measured by quantitative and qualitative shear wave elastography of breast cancer.

Authors:  Eun Jee Song; Yu-Mee Sohn; Mirinae Seo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer is associated with gene expression signatures of cell proliferation but not lymphangiogenesis or immune response.

Authors:  Mariko Asaoka; Santosh K Patnaik; Frank Zhang; Takashi Ishikawa; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Functional Role of miRNAs in the Progression of Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Authors:  Bethany N Hannafon; Wei-Qun Ding
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Clinicopathological variables predicting HER-2 gene status in immunohistochemistry-equivocal (2+) invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Yongling Ji; Liming Sheng; Xianghui Du; Guoqin Qiu; Bo Chen; Xiaojia Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Human Breast, Colorectal, Lung, Ovarian and Prostate Cancers.

Authors:  Irina Larionova; Gulnara Tuguzbaeva; Anastasia Ponomaryova; Marina Stakheyeva; Nadezhda Cherdyntseva; Valentin Pavlov; Evgeniy Choinzonov; Julia Kzhyshkowska
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Correlation of lymphovascular invasion with clinicopathological factors in invasive breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  San-Di Shen; Shi-Zhen Zhong; Chun-Zhong Wang; Wen-Hua Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.