Literature DB >> 22179822

Vertical modelling: Analysis of competing risks data with missing causes of failure.

M A Nicolaie1, H C van Houwelingen2, H Putter2.   

Abstract

We propose vertical modelling as a natural approach to the problem of analysis of competing risks data when failure types are missing for some individuals. Under a natural missing-at-random assumption for these missing failure types, we use the observed data likelihood to estimate its parameters and show that the all-cause hazard and the relative hazards appearing in vertical modelling are indeed key quantities of this likelihood. This fact has practical implications in that it suggests vertical modelling as a simple and attractive method of analysis in competing risks with missing causes of failure; all individuals are used in estimating the all-cause hazard and only those with non-missing cause of failure for relative hazards. The relative hazards also appear in a multiple imputation approach to the same problem proposed by Lu and Tsiatis and in the EM algorithm. We compare the vertical modelling approach with the method of Goetghebeur and Ryan for a breast cancer data set, highlighting the different aspects they contribute to the data analysis.
© The Author(s) 2011.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cause-specific hazard; competing risks; missing at random

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22179822     DOI: 10.1177/0962280211432067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  8 in total

1.  Bias Due to Confounders for the Exposure-Competing Risk Relationship.

Authors:  Catherine R Lesko; Bryan Lau
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 2.  Vertical modeling: analysis of competing risks data with a cure fraction.

Authors:  Mioara Alina Nicolaie; Jeremy M G Taylor; Catherine Legrand
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Multiple imputation methods for nonparametric inference on cumulative incidence with missing cause of failure.

Authors:  Minjung Lee; James J Dignam; Junhee Han
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Analysis of interval-censored competing risks data under missing causes.

Authors:  Debanjan Mitra; Ujjwal Das; Kalyan Das
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 1.416

5.  Causal inference in the face of competing events.

Authors:  Jacqueline E Rudolph; Catherine R Lesko; Ashley I Naimi
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2020-07-12

6.  Prostate cancer: net survival and cause-specific survival rates after multiple imputation.

Authors:  Adeline Morisot; Faïza Bessaoud; Paul Landais; Xavier Rébillard; Brigitte Trétarre; Jean-Pierre Daurès
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Missingness in the Setting of Competing Risks: from missing values to missing potential outcomes.

Authors:  Bryan Lau; Catherine Lesko
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-19

8.  Long-Term Disease-Free Survival of Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Iran: A Survival Model with Competing Risks Taking Cure Fraction and Frailty into Account

Authors:  Vahid Ghavami; Mahmood Mahmoudi; Abbas Rahimi Foroushani; Hossein Baghishani; Fatemeh Homaei Shandiz; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-10-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.