Literature DB >> 22179530

ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial: insights from the ECG substudy.

Paul W Armstrong1, Hany Siha, Yuling Fu, Cynthia M Westerhout, Ph Gabriel Steg, Stefan K James, Robert F Storey, Jay Horrow, Hugo Katus, Peter Clemmensen, Robert A Harrington, Lars Wallentin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor, when compared with clopidogrel, reduced the 12-month risk of vascular death/myocardial infarction and stroke in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes intended to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. This prespecified ECG substudy explored whether ticagrelor's association with vascular death and myocardial infarction within 1 year would be amplified by (1) the extent of baseline ST shift and (2) subsequently associated with fewer residual ST changes at hospital discharge. METHODS AND
RESULTS: ECGs were evaluated centrally in a core laboratory in 3122 ticagrelor- and 3084 clopidogrel-assigned patients having at least 1 mm ST-elevation in 2 contiguous leads as identified by site investigators on the qualifying ECG. Patients with greater ST-segment shift at baseline had higher rates of vascular death/myocardial infarction within 1 year. Among those who also had an ECG at hospital discharge (n=4798), patients with ≥50% ΣST-deviation (ΣST-dev) resolution had higher event-free survival than those with incomplete resolution (6.4% versus 8.8%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.69 (0.54-0.88), P=0.003). The extent of ΣST-dev resolution was similar irrespective of treatment assignment. The benefit of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on clinical events was consistent irrespective of the extent of baseline ΣST-dev (P(interaction)=0.728). When stratified according to conventional times from symptom onset, ie, ≤3 hours, 3 to 6 hours, >6 hours, the extent of baseline ΣST-dev declined progressively over time. As time from symptom onset increased beyond 3 hours, the benefit of ticagrelor appeared to be more pronounced; however, the interaction between time and treatment was not significant (P=0.175).
CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor did not modify ΣST-dev resolution at discharge nor was its benefit affected by the extent of baseline ΣST-dev. These hypothesis-generating observations suggest that the main effects of ticagrelor may not relate to the rapidity or the completeness of acute reperfusion, but rather the prevention of recurrent vascular events by more powerful platelet inhibition or other mechanisms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22179530     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.047530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  3 in total

1.  Effects of Ticagrelor on Myocardial Infarct Size.

Authors:  Joo-Yong Hahn
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 2.  Antiplatelet agents for chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Patrizia Natale; Suetonia C Palmer; Valeria M Saglimbene; Marinella Ruospo; Mona Razavian; Jonathan C Craig; Meg J Jardine; Angela C Webster; Giovanni Fm Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-28

3.  Does the level of myocardial injury differ in primary angioplasty patients loaded first with clopidogrel and the ones with ticagrelor?

Authors:  Nil Ozyuncu; Hüseyin Göksülük; Turkan Seda Tan; Kerim Esenboga; Yusuf Atmaca; Çetin Erol
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.596

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.