Literature DB >> 22178799

A matched case control study with propensity score balancing examining the protective effect of paracetamol against parentally reported apnoea in infants.

Paul Walsh1, Lucas Shanholtzer, Mark Loewen, Kim Trinh, Ben McEnulty, Stephen J Rothenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central apnoea occurs in infants and if not detected leads to death. Central apnoea is a prostaglandin E(2) (PGE2) mediated effect that is susceptible to pharmacologic manipulation in animal models. Paracetamol and ibuprofen are centrally and peripherally acting PGE2 inhibitors, respectively. AIM: To determine if infants who had received paracetamol or ibuprofen are relatively protected from apnoea.
METHODS: We performed a matched case control study using propensity score balancing to adjust for non-random drug assignment. We included infants from prospective studies of central apnoea and bronchiolitis. We matched on age, prematurity and fever to adjust for the infants' underlying risk of apnoea. The primary outcome measure was odds of exposure to paracetamol or ibuprofen by apneic infants compared to their controls.
RESULTS: Forty-two apneic and 729 non-apneic infants were identified. Infants with apnoea were younger than those without, median age 6.5 versus 12.2 weeks and were more likely to be premature. These differences were balanced using matching. Differences between those who did and did not receive paracetamol were satisfactorily balanced using the propensity score. Ibuprofen was used too infrequently to analyse it further. In the unadjusted analysis fewer apneic infants had had prior paracetamol use 5/42 (12%) versus 211/729 (29%) or prior ibuprofen use 1/42 (2%) versus 51/729 (7%). In the adjusted analysis paracetamol was protective against apnoea; OR 0.30 (95% CI 0.11, 0.78).
CONCLUSIONS: Prior paracetamol use was protective against apnoea in infants. We could not demonstrate an effect for ibuprofen. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22178799     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  4 in total

1.  Derivation of Candidate Clinical Decision Rules to Identify Infants at Risk for Central Apnea.

Authors:  Paul Walsh; Pádraig Cunningham; Sabrina Merchant; Nicholas Walker; Jacquelyn Heffner; Lucas Shanholtzer; Stephen J Rothenberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Apnea in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Alan R Schroeder; Jonathan M Mansbach; Michelle Stevenson; Charles G Macias; Erin Stucky Fisher; Besh Barcega; Ashley F Sullivan; Janice A Espinola; Pedro A Piedra; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Does study partner type impact the rate of Alzheimer's disease progression?

Authors:  Joshua D Grill; Yan Zhou; Jason Karlawish; David Elashoff
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.472

4.  Microbiome Markers of Pancreatic Cancer Based on Bacteria-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Acquired from Blood Samples: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Jae Ri Kim; Kyulhee Han; Youngmin Han; Nayeon Kang; Tae-Seop Shin; Hyeon Ju Park; Hongbeom Kim; Wooil Kwon; Seungyeoun Lee; Yoon-Keun Kim; Taesung Park; Jin-Young Jang
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.