Literature DB >> 22178723

Report on the 1st international workshop on procedures for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations, Berlin, Germany, 22-23 November 2010.

Dorothea Matysiak-Klose1, Faruque Ahmed, Philippe Duclos, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Frode Forland, Hans Houweling, Piotr Kramarz, Joanne M Langley, Thomas Mertens, Holger Schünemann, Kamel Senouci, Jonathan Temte, Ole Wichmann.   

Abstract

In November 2010, experts from European and North-American countries met in Berlin, Germany, to discuss improved methods for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations. The objectives of the workshop were to (i) review current procedures and experiences of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in developing a framework for evidence-based vaccination recommendations, (ii) discuss the applicability of methods like Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), and (iii) to identify opportunities for international collaboration to support NITAGs in the development of vaccination recommendations at country-level. Recognizing that a systematic and transparent approach is necessary to promote the quality and acceptance of vaccination recommendations, various decision making frameworks have been implemented by national and international advisory groups addressing common key aspects of knowledge, such as the burden of disease or characteristics of the vaccine. There are several challenges when grading the quality of evidence of some immunization-specific topics (e.g. population-level effects of vaccination). This does not, however, necessitate development of an entirely new systematic methodology. The participants concluded that (i) GRADE or a modification of this methodology is suitable for the grading of quality of evidence related to vaccine effectiveness and safety, and that (ii) international cooperation would be beneficial to develop common framework methodologies for certain aspects of national immunization recommendation developments in order to avoid duplication of efforts, to build on existing strengths, and to support NITAGs worldwide. Copyright Â
© 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22178723     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  3 in total

1.  [The new standard operating procedure of the German standing committee on vaccination (STIKO): history, structure, and implementation].

Authors:  Thomas Harder; Judith Koch; Rüdiger von Kries; Ole Wichmann
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Strong Public Health Recommendations from Weak Evidence? Lessons Learned in Developing Guidance on the Public Health Management of Meningococcal Disease.

Authors:  Germaine Hanquet; Pawel Stefanoff; Wiebke Hellenbrand; Sigrid Heuberger; Pierluigi Lopalco; James M Stuart
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Evidence-based decision-making in infectious diseases epidemiology, prevention and control: matching research questions to study designs and quality appraisal tools.

Authors:  Thomas Harder; Anja Takla; Eva Rehfuess; Alex Sánchez-Vivar; Dorothea Matysiak-Klose; Tim Eckmanns; Gérard Krause; Helena de Carvalho Gomes; Andreas Jansen; Simon Ellis; Frode Forland; Roberta James; Joerg J Meerpohl; Antony Morgan; Holger Schünemann; Teun Zuiderent-Jerak; Ole Wichmann
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.