Literature DB >> 22178488

Economic analyses of pig manure treatment options in Ireland.

Tereza Nolan1, Shane M Troy, Stephen Gilkinson, Peter Frost, Sihuang Xie, Xinmin Zhan, Caolan Harrington, Mark G Healy, Peadar G Lawlor.   

Abstract

An economic analysis was performed on treatment options for pig manure in Ireland. Costs were based on a 500 sow integrated pig farm producing 10,500 m(3) of manure per year at 4.8% dry matter. The anaerobic digestion of pig manure and grass silage (1:1; volatile solids basis) was unviable under the proposed tariffs, with costs at € 5.2 m(-3) manure. Subsequent solid-liquid separation of the digestate would cost an additional € 12.8 m(-3) manure. The treatment of the separated solid fraction by composting and of the liquid fraction by integrated constructed wetlands, would add € 2.8 and € 4.6 m(-3) manure, respectively to the treatment costs. The cost analysis presented showed that the technologies investigated are currently not cost effective in Ireland. Transport and spreading of raw manure, at € 4.9 m(-3) manure (15 km maximum distance from farm) is the most cost effective option.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22178488     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  4 in total

1.  Monitoring and assessment of surface water quality in Taquari-Antas Watershed, South Brazil-region with intensive pig farming.

Authors:  Vania Elisabete Schneider; Roger Vasques Marques; Taison Anderson Bortolin; Gisele Cemin; Geise Macedo Dos Santos
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Description, evaluation, and validation of the Teagasc Pig Production Model1.

Authors:  Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz; Laurence Shalloo; Jarkko K Niemi; Ilias Kyriazakis; Michael McKeon; Gerard McCutcheon; Alan Bohan; Edgar G Manzanilla
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Chemical amendment of pig slurry: control of runoff related risks due to episodic rainfall events up to 48 h after application.

Authors:  Cornelius J O' Flynn; Mark G Healy; Paul Wilson; Nyncke J Hoekstra; Shane M Troy; Owen Fenton
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Environmental trade-offs of pig production systems under varied operational efficiencies.

Authors:  G A McAuliffe; T Takahashi; L Mogensen; J E Hermansen; C L Sage; D V Chapman; M R F Lee
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 9.297

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.