Literature DB >> 22178443

Interpretation of ambiguous social scenarios in social phobia and depression: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Jason S Moser1, Jonathan D Huppert, Edna B Foa, Robert F Simons.   

Abstract

In the current study, event-related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral responses were measured in individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for social phobia, depression, their combination, or neither in order to examine the unique and combined effects of social phobia and depression on the interpretation of ambiguous social scenarios. ERPs revealed a lack of positive interpretation bias and some suggestion of a negative bias in the semantic expectancy N4 component across all clinical groups. Furthermore, socially phobic and comorbid individuals showed reductions in baseline attention allocation to the task, as indexed by P6 amplitude. RT and accuracy likewise revealed a lack of positive interpretation bias across disordered groups. When considered on a continuum across all samples, social phobia and depression symptoms were related to the N4 interpretation bias effect whereas P6 amplitude reduction and RT interpretation bias appeared uniquely associated with social phobia.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22178443     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  10 in total

1.  Environmental Health Factors and Sexually Dimorphic Differences in Behavioral Disruptions.

Authors:  Cheryl S Rosenfeld; Brian C Trainor
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2014-12

2.  Social Feedback Valence Differentially Modulates the Reward Positivity, P300, and Late Positive Potential.

Authors:  Carter J Funkhouser; Randy P Auerbach; Autumn Kujawa; Sylvia A Morelli; K Luan Phan; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  J Psychophysiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.333

3.  Threat and benign interpretation bias might not be a unidimensional construct.

Authors:  Shari A Steinman; Sam Portnow; Amber L Billingsley; Diheng Zhang; Bethany A Teachman
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2019-10-25

4.  Positive imagery cognitive bias modification (CBM) and internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT): a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alishia D Williams; Kathleen O'Moore; Simon E Blackwell; Jessica Smith; Emily A Holmes; Gavin Andrews
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Optimizing the ingredients for imagery-based interpretation bias modification for depressed mood: is self-generation more effective than imagination alone?

Authors:  Heike Rohrbacher; Simon E Blackwell; Emily A Holmes; Andrea Reinecke
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Neural sensitivity to social reward and punishment anticipation in social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Henk R Cremers; Ilya M Veer; Philip Spinhoven; Serge A R B Rombouts; Karin Roelofs
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Effects of cognitive bias modification on social anxiety: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haining Liu; Xianwen Li; Buxin Han; Xiaoqian Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of Experimental Paradigms for Exploring Biased Interpretation of Ambiguous Information with Emotional and Neutral Associations.

Authors:  Daniel E Schoth; Christina Liossi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-09

9.  Optogenetic modulation of descending prefrontocortical inputs to the dorsal raphe bidirectionally bias socioaffective choices after social defeat.

Authors:  Collin Challis; Sheryl G Beck; Olivier Berton
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Research Review: Is anxiety associated with negative interpretations of ambiguity in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suzannah Stuijfzand; Cathy Creswell; Andy P Field; Samantha Pearcey; Helen Dodd
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 8.982

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.