Literature DB >> 22177365

Epistemological and ethical assessment of obesity bias in industrialized countries.

Jacquineau Azétsop1, Tisha R Joy.   

Abstract

Bernard Lonergan's cognitive theory challenges us to raise questions about both the cognitive process through which obesity is perceived as a behaviour change issue and the objectivity of such a moral judgment. Lonergan's theory provides the theoretical tools to affirm that anti-fat discrimination, in the United States of America and in many industrialized countries, is the result of both a group bias that resists insights into the good of other groups and a general bias of anti-intellectualism that tends to set common sense against insights that require any thorough scientific analyses. While general bias diverts the public's attention away from the true aetiology of obesity, group bias sustains an anti-fat culture that subtly legitimates discriminatory practices and policies against obese people. Although anti-discrimination laws may seem to be a reasonable way of protecting obese and overweight individuals from discrimination, obesity bias can be best addressed by reframing the obesity debate from an environmental perspective from which tools and strategies to address both the social and individual determinants of obesity can be developed. Attention should not be concentrated on individuals' behaviour as it is related to lifestyle choices, without giving due consideration to the all-encompassing constraining factors which challenge the social and rational blindness of obesity bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22177365      PMCID: PMC3292805          DOI: 10.1186/1747-5341-6-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med        ISSN: 1747-5341            Impact factor:   2.464


  38 in total

1.  Obesity and virtue. Is staying lean a matter of ethics?

Authors:  J N Burry
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999 Dec 6-20       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 2.  Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective.

Authors:  N Krieger
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Portrayals of overweight and obese individuals on commercial television.

Authors:  Bradley S Greenberg; Matthew Eastin; Linda Hofschire; Ken Lachlan; Kelly D Brownell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Bias, discrimination, and obesity.

Authors:  R Puhl; K D Brownell
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2001-12

5.  The stigma of obesity: the consequences of naive assumptions concerning the causes of physical deviance.

Authors:  W DeJong
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1980-03

6.  Weight-teasing among adolescents: correlations with weight status and disordered eating behaviors.

Authors:  D Neumark-Sztainer; N Falkner; M Story; C Perry; P J Hannan; S Mulert
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2002-01

7.  The perceived relative worth of reaching and maintaining goal weight.

Authors:  P M O'Neil; C F Smith; G D Foster; D A Anderson
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-08

Review 8.  Genetics of body-weight regulation.

Authors:  G S Barsh; I S Farooqi; S O'Rahilly
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-06       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here?

Authors:  James O Hill; Holly R Wyatt; George W Reed; John C Peters
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Social class and changes in weight-for-height between childhood and early adulthood.

Authors:  C Power; C Moynihan
Journal:  Int J Obes       Date:  1988
View more
  3 in total

1.  Weighing in: the taste-engineering frame in obesity expert discourse.

Authors:  Selena E Ortiz; Frederick J Zimmerman; Franklin D Gilliam
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Role of the Endocannabinoid System in the Adipose Tissue with Focus on Energy Metabolism.

Authors:  Volatiana Rakotoarivelo; Jyoti Sihag; Nicolas Flamand
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Access to nutritious food, socioeconomic individualism and public health ethics in the USA: a common good approach.

Authors:  Jacquineau Azétsop; Tisha R Joy
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.464

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.