| Literature DB >> 22176925 |
Arthur J Matas, Sally Satel, Stephen Munn, Janet Radcliffe Richards, Angeles Tan-Alora, Frederike J A E Ambagtsheer, Micheal D H Asis, Leo Baloloy, Edward Cole, Jeff Crippin, David Cronin, Abdallah S Daar, James Eason, Richard Fine, Sander Florman, Richard Freeman, John Fung, Wulf Gaertner, Robert Gaston, Nasrollah Ghahramani, Ahad Ghods, Michelle Goodwin, Thomas Gutmann, Nadey Hakim, Benjamin Hippen, Ajit Huilgol, Igal Kam, Arlene Lamban, Walter Land, Alan Langnas, Reynaldo Lesaca, Gary Levy, RoseMarie Liquette, William H Marks, Charles Miller, Enrique Ona, Glenda Pamugas, Antonio Paraiso, Thomas G Peters, David Price, Gurch Randhawa, Alan Reed, Keith Rigg, Dennis Serrano, Hans Sollinger, Sankaran Sundar, Lewis Teperman, Gert van Dijk, Willem Weimar, Romina Danguilan.
Abstract
Incentives for organ donation, currently prohibited in most countries, may increase donation and save lives. Discussion of incentives has focused on two areas: (1) whether or not there are ethical principles that justify the current prohibition and (2) whether incentives would do more good than harm. We herein address the second concern and propose for discussion standards and guidelines for an acceptable system of incentives for donation. We believe that if systems based on these guidelines were developed, harms would be no greater than those to today's conventional donors. Ultimately, until there are trials of incentives, the question of benefits and harms cannot be satisfactorily answered.Entities:
Mesh：
Year: 2011 PMID： 22176925 PMCID： PMC3350332 DOI： 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03881.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN： 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086