OBJECTIVE: In 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed an impulse noise reduction rating (NRR) for hearing protection devices based upon the impulse peak insertion loss (IPIL) methods in the ANSI S12.42-2010 standard. This study tests the ANSI S12.42 methods with a range of hearing protection devices measured in field conditions. DESIGN: The method utilizes an acoustic test fixture and three ranges for impulse levels: 130-134, 148-152, and 166-170 dB peak SPL. For this study, four different models of hearing protectors were tested: Bilsom 707 Impact II electronic earmuff, E·A·R Pod Express, E·A·R Combat Arms version 4, and the Etymotic Research, Inc. Electronic BlastPLG™ EB1. STUDY SAMPLE: Five samples of each protector were fitted on the fixture or inserted in the fixture's ear canal five times for each impulse level. Impulses were generated by a 0.223 caliber rifle. RESULTS: The average IPILs increased with peak pressure and ranged between 20 and 38 dB. For some protectors, significant differences were observed across protector examples of the same model, and across insertions. CONCLUSIONS: The EPA's proposed methods provide consistent and reproducible results. The proposed impulse NRR rating should utilize the minimum and maximum protection percentiles as determined by the ANSI S12.42-2010 methods.
OBJECTIVE: In 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed an impulse noise reduction rating (NRR) for hearing protection devices based upon the impulse peak insertion loss (IPIL) methods in the ANSI S12.42-2010 standard. This study tests the ANSI S12.42 methods with a range of hearing protection devices measured in field conditions. DESIGN: The method utilizes an acoustic test fixture and three ranges for impulse levels: 130-134, 148-152, and 166-170 dB peak SPL. For this study, four different models of hearing protectors were tested: Bilsom 707 Impact II electronic earmuff, E·A·R Pod Express, E·A·R Combat Arms version 4, and the Etymotic Research, Inc. Electronic BlastPLG™ EB1. STUDY SAMPLE: Five samples of each protector were fitted on the fixture or inserted in the fixture's ear canal five times for each impulse level. Impulses were generated by a 0.223 caliber rifle. RESULTS: The average IPILs increased with peak pressure and ranged between 20 and 38 dB. For some protectors, significant differences were observed across protector examples of the same model, and across insertions. CONCLUSIONS: The EPA's proposed methods provide consistent and reproducible results. The proposed impulse NRR rating should utilize the minimum and maximum protection percentiles as determined by the ANSI S12.42-2010 methods.
Authors: William J Murphy; John R Franks; Elliott H Berger; Alberto Behar; John G Casali; Christine Dixon-Ernst; Edward F Krieg; Ben T Mozo; Julia D Royster; Larry H Royster; Stephen D Simon; Carol Stephenson Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Yi-Ming Zhao; Wei Qiu; Lin Zeng; Shan-Song Chen; Xiao-Ru Cheng; Robert I Davis; Roger P Hamernik Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Deanna K Meinke; Donald S Finan; Jacob Soendergaard; Gregory A Flamme; William J Murphy; James E Lankford; Michael Stewart Journal: Int J Audiol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.117
Authors: Deanna K Meinke; Donald S Finan; Gregory A Flamme; William J Murphy; Michael Stewart; James E Lankford; Stephen Tasko Journal: Semin Hear Date: 2017-10-10
Authors: William J Murphy; Cameron J Fackler; Elliott H Berger; Peter B Shaw; Mike Stergar Journal: Noise Health Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 0.867
Authors: Timothy S Wells; Amber D Seelig; Margaret A K Ryan; Jason M Jones; Tomoko I Hooper; Isabel G Jacobson; Edward J Boyko Journal: Noise Health Date: 2015 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 0.867