Literature DB >> 22175786

Radiological preparedness-awareness and attitudes: a cross-sectional survey of emergency medicine residents and physicians at three academic institutions in the United States.

Sophia Sheikh1, Lisa C McCormick, Jesse Pevear, Spencer Adoff, Frank G Walter, Ziad N Kazzi.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Emergency preparedness has been increasingly recognized as important. Research shows many medical personnel feel unprepared to respond to radiation incidents. Knowledge and attitudes of emergency medicine residents and faculty are largely unstudied, regarding their abilities to provide care for radiation disaster victims. It is unknown whether receiving training in radiological emergency preparedness improves knowledge and attitudes.
OBJECTIVES: (1) Assess the attitudes of emergency medicine residents and faculty toward a radiological disaster; (2) Assess knowledge gaps of emergency medicine residents and faculty regarding radiological emergency preparedness; (3) Assess the attitudes of emergency medicine residents and faculty toward different educational strategies.
METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to 309 emergency medicine residents and faculty at three U.S. academic institutions. Analyses were performed using SAS 9.0 software.
RESULTS: The survey response rate was 36.6%. Only 37% and 28% of respondents had attended radiological preparedness training in the preceding 5 years or any training in radiation detection, respectively. Higher proportions of trained physicians were: (1) more familiar with DTPA and Prussian blue; (2) more comfortable assessing, decontaminating, and managing victims of radiation incidents; and (3) more comfortable using radiation detectors than their untrained counterparts. Many respondents were unable to differentiate between contamination with and exposure to radiological material. Classroom teaching at the workplace and prepackaged educational materials were most frequently rated as the preferred educational method for radiation preparedness training. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a need for additional radiological-nuclear preparedness training for emergency medicine residents and faculty. Training should include radiation detection, decontamination, explaining differences between radiation exposure and contamination, and teaching patient management, including DTPA and Prussian blue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22175786     DOI: 10.3109/15563650.2011.637047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-3650            Impact factor:   4.467


  3 in total

Review 1.  Emergency department management of patients internally contaminated with radioactive material.

Authors:  Ziad Kazzi; Jennifer Buzzell; Luiz Bertelli; Doran Christensen
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  Differences in the Awareness and Knowledge of Radiological and Nuclear Events Among Medical Workers in Japan.

Authors:  Kanae Ochiai; Tomo Oka; Nagisa Kato; Yuji Kondo; Yasuhiro Otomo; Raymond E Swienton
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 3.  Medical Therapy of Patients Contaminated with Radioactive Cesium or Iodine.

Authors:  Jan Aaseth; Valeria Marina Nurchi; Ole Andersen
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-12-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.