Literature DB >> 2217550

Ultraviolet light induces double-strand breaks in DNA of cultured human P3 cells as measured by neutral filter elution.

J G Peak1, M J Peak.   

Abstract

Neutral filter elution at pH 7.2 and 9.6 was used to measure the induction of DNA lesions in human P3 teratocarcinoma cells by monochromatic 254-, 270-, 313-, 334-, 365-, and 405-nm radiation and by 60 gamma rays. In this assay DNA double-strand breaks (dsb) increase the rate of elution of DNA from cell lysates on a filter. Yields of dsb as measured by this procedure were determined by using a calibration of the assay that correlates elution parameters with number of dsb caused by disintegration of 125I incorporated into the DNA. Analysis of fluence responses obtained by using the calibrated assay indicated that the number of dsb induced per dalton of DNA as measured by this assay is proportional to the square of the fluence at all the energies of radiation studied, implying that the induction of these lesions may be a two-hit event. Analysis of the relative efficiencies for the induction of dsb by ultraviolet radiation, corrected for quantum efficiency, revealed a spectrum that coincided closely with that for the induction of single-strand breaks (ssb) in the same cells, having a close fit with the spectrum of nucleic acid in the UVC and UVB region below 313 nm, and a shoulder in the UVA region. It was calculated, however, that there may be too few ssb for dsb to result from randomly distributed closely opposed ssb.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2217550     DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1990.tb04194.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  7 in total

1.  Retention but not recruitment of Crb2 at double-strand breaks requires Rad1 and Rad3 complexes.

Authors:  Li-Lin Du; Toru M Nakamura; Bettina A Moser; Paul Russell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Biological dose estimation of UVA laser microirradiation utilizing charged particle-induced protein foci.

Authors:  J Splinter; B Jakob; M Lang; K Yano; J Engelhardt; S W Hell; D J Chen; M Durante; G Taucher-Scholz
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Inhibition of histone deacetylases enhances DNA damage repair in SCNT embryos.

Authors:  Rodrigo Camponogara Bohrer; Raj Duggavathi; Vilceu Bordignon
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  DNA repair synthesis following irradiation with 254-nm and 312-nm ultraviolet light is not diminished in fibroblasts from patients with dysplastic nevus syndrome.

Authors:  H W Thielmann; O Popanda; L Edler; A Böing; E G Jung
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Rad51 accumulation at sites of DNA damage and in postreplicative chromatin.

Authors:  S Tashiro; J Walter; A Shinohara; N Kamada; T Cremer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-07-24       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 6.  The Dark Side of UV-Induced DNA Lesion Repair.

Authors:  Wojciech Strzałka; Piotr Zgłobicki; Ewa Kowalska; Aneta Bażant; Dariusz Dziga; Agnieszka Katarzyna Banaś
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 7.  All You Need Is Light. Photorepair of UV-Induced Pyrimidine Dimers.

Authors:  Agnieszka Katarzyna Banaś; Piotr Zgłobicki; Ewa Kowalska; Aneta Bażant; Dariusz Dziga; Wojciech Strzałka
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.096

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.