AIMS: To determine whether collaborative behavioral management (CBM) reduces substance use, crime and re-arrest among drug-involved parolees. DESIGN: Step'n Out was a randomized behavioral trial of CBM versus standard parole (SP) during 2004-08. CBM adapted evidence-based role induction, behavioral contracting and contingent reinforcement to provide parole officer/treatment counselor dyads with positive tools in addition to sanctions to manage parolees' behavior over 12 weeks. SETTING:Six parole offices in five states in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Parolee volunteers with a mandate for addiction treatment and a minimum of 3 months of parole (n = 476). Follow-up was 94% at 3 months and 86% at 9 months. MEASUREMENTS: Drug use and crime in a given month from calendar interviews 3 and 9 months after parole initiation, and re-arrests from criminal justice administrative data. FINDINGS: The CBM group had fewer months in which they used their primary drug [adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05, 0.78, P = 0.02] and alcohol (ARR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.66, P = 0.006) over follow-up. CBM had its greatest effects among parolees who reported marijuana or another 'non-hard' drug as their primary drug; parolees who preferred stimulants or opiates did not benefit. No differences were seen in total crime, re-arrests or parole revocations. CONCLUSIONS:Collaborative behavioral management may reduce substance use among primary marijuana or other 'non-hard' drug-using parolees without increasing revocations. Because the majority of drug violation arrests in the United States are for marijuana, these findings have important implications for the management of a substantial proportion of the US community correctional population. Published 2011. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To determine whether collaborative behavioral management (CBM) reduces substance use, crime and re-arrest among drug-involved parolees. DESIGN: Step'n Out was a randomized behavioral trial of CBM versus standard parole (SP) during 2004-08. CBM adapted evidence-based role induction, behavioral contracting and contingent reinforcement to provide parole officer/treatment counselor dyads with positive tools in addition to sanctions to manage parolees' behavior over 12 weeks. SETTING: Six parole offices in five states in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Parolee volunteers with a mandate for addiction treatment and a minimum of 3 months of parole (n = 476). Follow-up was 94% at 3 months and 86% at 9 months. MEASUREMENTS: Drug use and crime in a given month from calendar interviews 3 and 9 months after parole initiation, and re-arrests from criminal justice administrative data. FINDINGS: The CBM group had fewer months in which they used their primary drug [adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05, 0.78, P = 0.02] and alcohol (ARR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.66, P = 0.006) over follow-up. CBM had its greatest effects among parolees who reported marijuana or another 'non-hard' drug as their primary drug; parolees who preferred stimulants or opiates did not benefit. No differences were seen in total crime, re-arrests or parole revocations. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative behavioral management may reduce substance use among primary marijuana or other 'non-hard' drug-using parolees without increasing revocations. Because the majority of drug violation arrests in the United States are for marijuana, these findings have important implications for the management of a substantial proportion of the US community correctional population. Published 2011. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Peter D Friedmann; Elizabeth C Katz; Anne G Rhodes; Faye S Taxman; Daniel J O'Connell; Linda K Frisman; William M Burdon; Bennett W Fletcher; Mark D Litt; Jennifer Clarke; Steven S Martin Journal: J Offender Rehabil Date: 2008-07-01
Authors: Fiona G Kouyoumdjian; Kathryn E McIsaac; Jessica Liauw; Samantha Green; Fareen Karachiwalla; Winnie Siu; Kaite Burkholder; Ingrid Binswanger; Lori Kiefer; Stuart A Kinner; Mo Korchinski; Flora I Matheson; Pam Young; Stephen W Hwang Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kathryn E McCollister; Christy K Scott; Michael L Dennis; Derek M Freitas; Michael T French; Rodney R Funk Journal: J Offender Rehabil Date: 2014-09-16
Authors: Danielle S Rudes; Jill Viglione; Ashli J Sheidow; Michael R McCart; Jason E Chapman; Faye S Taxman Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2020-09-22
Authors: Richard A Van Dorn; Sarah L Desmarais; Candalyn B Rade; Elizabeth N Burris; Gary S Cuddeback; Kiersten L Johnson; Stephen J Tueller; Megan L Comfort; Kim T Mueser Journal: Trials Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 2.279